摘要
本研究选取了WIPO排名前六的经济体进行设计系统宏观框架的对比,它们是:理论研究推动政府施行创新战略的英国;利用战略联盟全局推动设计产业发展的欧盟;围绕产业核心、行业协会组织为推手的美国;公共投资推动好设计影响力的日本;通过国家计划将设计提升至国策层面的韩国;高速发展、以地方园区集聚为特色的中国。
This study has chosen the top six WIPO economies to compare the macro-framework of the design system,which are:the Great Britain whose theoretical research promoting the government to apply innovation strategies;the Europe Union who makes use of strategic alliances to promote the overall development of the design industry;the United States who organizes driving forces around its industrial core and industry associations;Japan who make good use of public investment to promote design influence;Korea who promote design to be its national policy through thenational plan;and China who featuring in rapid development andlocal industrial zones gathering together.
出处
《南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第5期61-68,I0003,共9页
Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute:Fine Arts & Design
关键词
设计系统框架
国际比较
设计政策
设计推广
Design system framework
international comparison
designpolicy
design promotion