期刊文献+

物理学业成绩的群体差异比较及启示

THE COMPARISON AND REVELATION OF GROUP DIFFERENCES IN THE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF COLLEGE PHYSICS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 拥有不同的背景知识的学生在同一课堂进行学习时,会体现出不同的差异性。本研究以某大学某学院经济和传播专业的学生为研究对象,选取“College Physics”课程的学业成绩作比较,包括摸底初试、摸底中试、期中考试、期末考试等成绩,除了文科、理科的区别外,还考虑了男女性别差异,单招、统招生源的差异以及生源地的差异。通过分析发现:理科生的各次测试平均分值明显高于文科生;文科生的提升值显著高于理科生,但文科生成绩提升到的终值普遍不如理科生的高;女生初试成绩较男生低,但其他成绩显著地高于男生,尤其是理科男生通过复习而获得的成绩提升较少;统招理科女生占据高分榜,统招文科男生与统招文科女生平均分值相当,单招文科、理科女生均普遍好过男生;文理科成绩在不同地域上的表现一致。基于以上分析结果,本文提出几点教学启示。 The relationship between background and students' academic achievement is investigated while teacher keeping the practice under same teaching condition.Taking economics and communication students in one university as an example,academic performance of a baseline qualifying examination,a repeated test,a mid-term exam and a final exam is collected and analyzed.In addition to the differences between liberal arts and science,effects of individuals' characteristics as gender,residence,differences in single and unified enrollment sources,educational background and admission score are focused.Through the analysis,it is found that sciences students' average score of each test is higher than that of liberal arts students.The promotion value of liberal arts students is significantly higher than that of science students,but the final score of liberal arts students is generally inferior to that of science students.Girls' initial qualifying test scores are lower than that of boys,but other scores are significantly higher than boys,especially those of science boys,who get less improvement through review.Girls in general enrollment occupy the high scoring list.As for art students in general enrollment,the average score of boys in general enrollment is equal to that of girls in general enrollment.Girls in single enrollment in liberal arts and science are generally better than boys.The performance of arts and sciences is consistent in different regions.Based on the analysis results above,several teaching inspirations are put forward.
作者 吕洪凤 黄丽 刘畅 LV Hongfeng;HUANG Li;LIU Chang(International College,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083;School of Science,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin Heilongjiang 150001)
出处 《物理与工程》 2019年第3期41-46,共6页 Physics and Engineering
基金 文化自信在college physics中的隐性教育实践(201814)
关键词 学业成绩 差异比较 教学启示 academic performance difference comparison teaching inspiration
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1兰志丰,莫颖.英语词汇记忆策略探究[J].教育探索,2008(4):60-61. 被引量:11
  • 2华维芬.外语学习者策略训练刍议[J].外语界,2002(3):2-7. 被引量:189
  • 3OXFORD R. Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know [ M ]. Rowley, Mass : Newbury House, 1990:39.
  • 4SCHMITT N, MCCARTHY M. Vocabulary: description, ac- quisition and pedagogy [ M ]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Eclueation Press ,2005:208 - 216.
  • 5O'MALLEY J M,CHAMOT A U. Learning strategies in sec- ond language acquisition [ M ]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press,2001:43 - 55.
  • 6ATAY D. Memory strategy instruction, contextual learning and ESP vocab~ary recall [ J ]. English for Specific Purpo- ses,2007 (1) :39-51.
  • 7GUY Q, JOHNSON R K. Vocabulary strategies and lan- guage learning outcomes [ J ]. Language learning, 46 (4) : 643 - 679.
  • 8刘电芝.学习策略研究[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1999.325.
  • 9李秀萍.词汇学习中的认知与元认知策略培训研究[J].西安外国语大学学报,2008,16(3):95-97. 被引量:18
  • 10伍忠丽,相廷礼.语境策略对高职学生词汇习得影响的实证研究[J].河北北方学院学报(社会科学版),2009,25(2):76-79. 被引量:1

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部