期刊文献+

基于速度与准确率权衡的心理测量学模型及应用 被引量:3

A Psychometric Model for Speed-accuracy Tradeoff and Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在大规模被试评价中,任务完成的准确率一直是评价的主要指标。然而,在各种任务情景中,反映执行者素质的指标除了结果的正确性之外,决策过程的时效性同样是极其重要的。因此,开发一个适合大规模评价情景,同时考虑速度与准确率权衡的模型,探索被试作答准确率与速度间的关系将具有重要的价值。基于认知心理学实验中的速度与准确率研究,构建一个基于速度与准确率权衡的心理测量学模型。新模型参数能非常稳定而又精确地被估计,同时模型中的变量及其关系也能够很好地得到实测数据的支持。 The accuracy of completing a task has always been the main evaluation index in the large-scale assessment.However,during a variety of task situations,all the indexes indicating the quality of the doers are extremely important,including the correctness of the re-sult as well as the timeliness of the decision-making process.Therefore,the precision of results and fluency level of reaction should be regarded as the two indispensable indexes that evaluate the quality of each individual in finishing tasks.Grounded on the research of speed and accuracy in cognitive experiment,the manuscript will make the cognitive experiment of the speed-accuracy tradeoff model out of the lab and make it a large-scale assessment of model that can be applied to more complex situations of cognitive tasks by build-ing a psychometric model based on the speed-accuracy tradeoff.The new psychometric model of parameters based on speed-accuracy tradeoff can be estimated very stably and accurately.At the same time,the variables of model and their relations can be well supported by the real data.Finally,the quality of the subjects can be evaluated from different methods by the speed-accuracy tradeoff model.
作者 郭小军 罗照盛 Guo Xiaojun;Luo Zhaosheng(Psychology College,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022)
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期451-460,共10页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 速度与准确率权衡 大规模评价 认知实验 心理测量 speed-accuracy tradeoff large-scale assessment cognitive experiment psychometric model
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献22

  • 1Azzalini, A. (1985). A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statisges, 12, 171-178.
  • 2Baker, F. B. & Kim, S. H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • 3Kang, T., & Cohen, A. S. (2007). IRT model selection methods for dichotomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 331-358.
  • 4Klein Entink, R. H., Fox, J. P., & van der Linden, W. J. (2009). A multivariate multilevel approach to the modeling of accuracy and speed of test takers. Psyehomettlka, 74, 21 --48.
  • 5Klein Entink, R. H., van der Linden, W. J., & Fox, J. P. (2009). A Box-Cox normal model for response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 621-640.
  • 6Lee, Y. H., & Chen, H. (2011). A review of recent response-time analyses in educational testing. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53, 359- 379.
  • 7Li, F. M., Cohen, A. S., Kim, S. H., & Cho, S. J. (2009). Model selection methods for mixture, dichotomous IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33, 353-373.
  • 8I.oeys, T., Rosseel, Y., & Batena, K. (2011). A joint modeling approach for reaction time and accuracy in psycholinguistic experiments. Psyehometffka, 76, 487- 503.
  • 9Meyer, J. P. (2010). A mixture Rasch model with item response time components. Applied Psycbological Measurement, 34, 521-538.
  • 10Meng, X. B., Tan, J., & Chang, H. H. (2015). A conditional joint modeling approach for locally dependent item responses and response times. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52, 1-27.

共引文献8

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部