期刊文献+

基于多层验证性因素分析的各种信度系数方法 被引量:10

Various Reliability Coefficient Methods Under Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,心理学研究的复现性受到广泛关注,许多实证研究难以重复验证,信度较低。大量研究使用多层技术,但只报告整体信度,导致研究可重复危机。基于各种信度系数和验证性因素分析的理论,以二层模型为例,总结多层信度计算方法,通过文献综述检索应用情况,并用MPLUS进行实例演示,最后讨论单层信度估计存在的偏差及分层估计的好处。总之,对多层数据进行分层信度估计是很有必要的,可消除因测量工具缺乏信度而导致的研究不可重复。 In recent years,the reproducibility of psychological science has received extensive attention.Many empirical studies were dif-ficult to replicate and therefore had low reliability.It is noted that more and more researchers used a multilevel data structure and hierar-chical linear modeling(HLM)for analysis.However,most of them only displayed the overall reliability,resulting in the research repro-ducibility crisis.Based on the confirmatory factor analysis(CFA),the article introduced estimation methods of different reliability coeffi-cients.Taking a two-level model as an example,it also summarized the multilevel reliability estimation methods.In addition,to evalu-ate the application of multilevel reliability,the article investigated the researches in the past five years.Then,it illustrated how to use the software MPLUS to execute reliability estimation with an example.Finally,the article discussed the deviation of single-level reliability estimation and the benefits of hierarchical estimation.In summary,it is necessary to perform hierarchical reliability estimation in the multilevel data structure,which can eliminate the reproducibility crisis caused by unreliable measurement tools.
作者 田雪垠 郑蝉金 郭少阳 贺冠瑞 Tian Xueyin;Zheng Chanjin;Guo Shaoyang;He Guanrui(Department of Psychology,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433;Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062;School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022)
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期461-467,共7页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 可重复危机 验证性因素分析 多层信度 MPLUS reproducibility crisis confirmatory factor analysis multilevel reliability MPLUS
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献131

  • 1孟庆茂,刘红云.α系数在使用中存在的问题[J].心理学探新,2002,22(3):42-47. 被引量:17
  • 2陈维政,李金平.组织气候研究回顾及展望[J].外国经济与管理,2005,27(8):18-25. 被引量:53
  • 3屠金路,金瑜,王庭照.bootstrap法在合成分数信度区间估计中的应用[J].心理科学,2005,28(5):1199-1200. 被引量:12
  • 4陈丽娜,张明,金志成,赵闪,梅松丽.中小学生感觉寻求量表的编制与应用[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(4):103-108. 被引量:33
  • 5ten Holt, J. C., van Duijn, M. A., & Boomsma, A. Scale construction and evaluation in practice: A review of factor analysis versus item response theory applications [J]. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 2010, 52(3): 272- 297.
  • 6Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. Commentary on coefficient alpha: A cautionary tale [J]. Psychometrika, 2009, 74(1): 121-135.
  • 7Raykov, T., Dimitrov, D, M., & Asparouhov, T. Evaluation of scale reliability with binary measures using latent variable modeling[J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 2010, 17 ( 1 ) : 265-289.
  • 8Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma[J]. Psychometrika, 2009, 74( 1 ) : 145-154.
  • 9Yang, Y., & Green, S. B. A Note on structural equation modeling estimates of reliability[J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 2010, 17(1): 66-81.
  • 10Biemer, P. P., Christ, S. L., & Wiesen, C. A. A general approach for estimating scale score reliability for panel survey data[J]. Psychological Methods, 2009, 14(4) : 400- 412.

共引文献214

同被引文献294

引证文献10

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部