国内小儿推拿文献质量简析——基于CSCD以及CNKI的比较研究

A Brief Quality Analysis of Pediatric Tuina in China——A Comparative Study based on CSCD and CNKI

目的:探析小儿推拿学术研究领域的文献质量概况。方法:对中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)以及中国国家知识基础设施数据库(CNKI)中小儿推拿相关的文献进行检索及对比,并采用数据挖掘技术进行分析。结果:CSCD数据库收录的小儿推拿文献数量增加缓慢,数量较少,共检索出47篇;CNKI数据库的相关文献数量增加迅速,数量众多,共有1293篇;CSCD收录文献的平均被引频次为5.81,CNKI为2.60;湖南地区的小儿推拿学者居于该领域CSCD中心地位。结论:高质量、高水平的小儿推拿研究较少,且集中于湖南地区,该区域的小儿推拿学术水平较高,国内小儿推拿研究的整体水平仍有待进一步提高。

Objective:To explore the scientific quality in the field of pediatric Tuina.Methods:Chinese Scientific Citation Database(CSCD)and China National Kmowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)were searched and compared,and data mining is used for analysis.Results:The quantity of high-quality pediatric massage literature in CSCD database increased slowly,and a total of 47 papers were retrieved.The number of relevant literature of CNKI database has been increasing year by year,with a total of 1293 articles.The average citation frequency of the literature included in CSCD was 5.81 and CNKI was 2.60.Scholars of Hu'nan districtare the center of CSCD in this field.Conclusion:High-quality and high-level pediatric massage research is still rare,and focuses on Hu'nan region.The improvements of academic level inpediatric Tuina is still needed.