期刊文献+

不同线上销售模式的产品定价策略研究 被引量:12

The Pricing Strategy in Different Online Selling Schemes
原文传递
导出
摘要 现售和预售是线上销售的主要模式。考虑不同模式下消费者对产品估值的差异,分析现售、预售和混合销售(同时开展现售和预售)三种模式下消费者购买决策过程,构建Stackelberg博弈和Nash均衡模型,得到三种模式的产品均衡定价及需求,并探讨开展不同销售模式对应的消费者估值差异阈值以及不同主导结构对供应链企业绩效的影响。结果表明:任意主导结构下,销售模式只会影响现售产品价格,对预售产品定价没有影响;任意销售模式下,制造商主导结构的产品定价和批发价更高,但产品销售量较低;消费者延迟收货敏感度增强使预售模式的供应链成员企业的利润降低,但混合销售模式可以有效防止由此引起的损失,且制造商主导可以同时实现供应链成员企业的利益最大化。 With the development of e-commerce,online sales have vastly contributed to the growth of retail sales in China.There are two main selling schemes for online sellers.One is regular selling,the other is discount advance selling.The consumers’valuations are distinct between different selling schemes,which is called consumption value difference.We focus on analyzing three interesting questions.First,how does the online seller design the more beneficial selling schemes?Second,since both the consumers’valuations and delivery lead time setting by online seller are different in the two main schemes,how do the seller’s equilibrium decisions be affected by consumption value difference and the time-sensitivity?Third,how do dominant structures influence the equilibrium strategy?These questions are important to online sellers because they are closely related to operational decisions.Considering the consumption value difference,the consumer shopping behaviors under regular selling mode,discount advance selling mode and dual selling mode are first characterized.The structural properties of the equilibrium strategies are provided in three sales schemes using the optimization technique under Stackelberg Game and Nash Equilibrium.Then,according to the threshold of consumption value difference,the conditions are identified under which selling mode choose for online seller.The impacts of selling modes and the dominant structures of the supply chain on the equilibrium strategies are analyzed.Finally,the influences of consumption value difference and the delivery lead time on optimal expected profit are analyzed in an numerical example.The research reveals that a medium threshold of consumption value difference exists in dual selling mode where both the online seller and manufacturer outperform their counterparts in two main selling schemes.Selling mode has no effect on the price of pre-order product while influences the price of regular product.Optimal product price and wholesale price derived from manufacturer-dominated supply chain are high but the sales volume is the opposite.With the increasing consumer time-sensitivity,the firms’performance will decrease under discount advance selling mode only.It is necessary to shorten the lead time in order to prevent sales decrease under discount advance selling mode.It is also found that the profit is relatively prominent in the manufacturer-dominated supply chain under the dual selling mode.These results will contribute to online sellers in choosing an appropriate and efficient sales strategy.
作者 白世贞 姜曼 BAI Shi-zhen;JIANG Man(School of Management,Harbin University of Commerce,Harbin 150028,China)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第10期159-169,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371061,71671054)
关键词 线上销售模式 折扣预售 估值差异 定价策略 online selling scheme discount advance selling consumption value difference pricing strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献74

  • 1陈旭.考虑期权合同供应链的零售商订货研究[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(3):17-23. 被引量:33
  • 2宁钟,林滨.供应链风险管理中的期权机制[J].系统工程学报,2007,22(2):141-147. 被引量:26
  • 3Eppen G D, Iyer A V. Backup agreements in fashion buying--The value of upstream flexibility [ J ]. Management Science, 1997, 43( 11 ) : 1469 - 1484.
  • 4Brown A O, Lee H L. Optimal pay-to-delay capacity reservation with application to the semiconductor industry [ R ]. Working Paper, Stanford, CA: Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Stanford University, 1997.
  • 5Bassok Y, Anupindi R. Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment [ J ]. liE Transactions, 1997, 9 (5) : 373 - 381.
  • 6Tsay A A, Lovejoy W. Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance [ J ]. Journal Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 1999, 1 (2) : 89 - 111.
  • 7Wang Q Z, Tsao D. Supply contract with bidirectional options : The buyer' s perspective [ J ]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 101 ( 1 ) :30 -52.
  • 8Barnes-Schuster D, Bassok Y, Anupindi R. Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options [J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2002, 4 (3) : 171 - 207.
  • 9Cachon G. , Lariviere M A. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain[ J]. Manage- ment Science, 2001, 47 (5) : 629 -646.
  • 10Cheng F, Ettl M, Lin G Y, et al. Flexible Supply Contracts via Options[ R]. Working Paper, J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY : IBM T 2003.

共引文献90

同被引文献133

引证文献12

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部