期刊文献+

氨磺必利与喹硫平治疗精神分裂症患者的疗效和安全性 被引量:11

Comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of amisulpride and quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较氨磺必利与喹硫平治疗精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。方法随机选取2016年8月~2018年8月我院精神分裂症患者60例,随机分为氨磺必利组(30例)和喹硫平组(30例),比较两组患者的PNASS评分、临床疗效、不良反应发生情况。结果治疗前,两组患者的一般精神病理、阳性症状、阴性症状评分及PANSS总分之间无明显差异(P>0.05)两组患者治疗后的一般精神病理、阳性症状、阴性症状评分及PANSS总分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05),但组间没有差异;氨磺必利组和喹硫平组的总有效率无明显差异(P>0.05)。氨磺必利组的不良反应发生率23.3%(7/30)显著低于喹硫平组43.3%(13/30)(P<0.05)。结论氨磺必利与喹硫平治疗精神分裂症的疗效相当,但氨磺必利较喹硫平不良反应少。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of amisulpride and quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods Sixty cases of patients with schizophrenia in our hospital from August 2016 to August 2018 were selected and randomly divided into two groups :the amisulpride group(30 cases)and the quetiapine group(30 cases). The PNASS scores,clinical efficacy,occurrances of adverse reactions in the two groups were compared. Results Before treatment,There were no difference in general psychopathology,positive symptoms,and negative symptom scores and total scores of PANSS between the two groups(P>0.05). After treatment,the general psychopathology,positive symptoms,negative symptom scores and PANSS scores in both of two groups were significantly reduced than before treatment(P<0.05),there are no difference between two groups. The difference of total effective rate of treatment between the amisulpride group(90.0%)and quetiapine group(86.7%)was not difference(P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of the amisulpride group(23.3%)was significantly lower than the quetiapine group(43.3%)(P<0.05). Conclusion Amisulpride is equivalent to quetiapine in the treatment of schizophrenia,but amisulpride is safer than quetiapine.
作者 陈春 刘建农 张栋进 黄小燕 CHEN Chun;LIU Jiannong;ZHANG Dongjin(Suzhou wujiang district mental rehabilitation hospital,Suzhou 215200,China)
出处 《国际精神病学杂志》 2019年第5期854-855,858,共3页 Journal Of International Psychiatry
关键词 氨磺必利 喹硫平 精神分裂症 疗效 安全性 Amisulpride Quetiapine Schizophrenia Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献45

  • 1李刚,张秋红,王丽莉,王翼.奎硫平治疗精神分裂症临床分析[J].临床精神医学杂志,2005,15(2):113-113. 被引量:5
  • 2翟金国,赵靖平,房茂胜.新型非典型抗精神病药临床应用评价[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2006,25(4):296-301. 被引量:42
  • 3郭田生,李小玲.奎硫平治疗以阴性症状为主精神分裂症对照研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2006,16(6):373-373. 被引量:2
  • 4沈渔邨.精神病学[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:215.
  • 5舒良.精神分裂症防治指南[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2007:64.
  • 6Kerwin R. From pharmacological profiles to clinical outcomes[ J]. J Int Clin Psychopharmaco1,2000,15 (4) : 1 - 3.
  • 7Miguel H E ,Rogelio A ,Aria F ,et 81. The effects of amisulpride on five dimensions of psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia:a prospective open - label study[ J ]. J BMC Psychiatry,2005,5 ( 3 ) : 22 - 24.
  • 8Komossa K, Rummel -Kluge C, Schwarz S, et al. 01anzapine ver- sus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia [ J ]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010,17 ( 3 ) :654 - 656.
  • 9Bhowmiek S, Hazra A, Ghost M. Amisulpfide versus olanzaplne in the treatment of schizophrenia in Indian patients:randomized con- trolled trial[J]. J Aust N Z - Psychiatry ,2010,44(3) :237 -239.
  • 10Nuss P, Tessier C. Antipsychotic medication, functional outcome and quality of life in schizophrenia:focus on amisulpride[J]. Curt Med Res Opin, 2010, 26(4): 787-801.

共引文献84

同被引文献73

引证文献11

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部