构建“中国梦”的“思想—理论体系”——兼与石仲泉、罗振建等学者商榷

“Chinese Dream” as an “Ideological-Theoretical System”——Discussing with Shi Zhongquan, Luo Zhenjian and Other Scholars

"中国梦"是否可以称作一个思想-理论体系,目前理论-学术界看法不一,并且意见分歧非常大。代表性学者石仲泉先生是明确反对"中国梦是理论体系"这样的提法的,而罗振建先生和程美东先生则主张中国梦是一个"理论体系"("科学思想体系"),但很遗憾,罗、程二先生都将"中国梦"的"理论体系"("科学思想体系")简单地归结为"一体三位",这实际上是很不周全的。因为事实上,"中国梦"的思想-理论体系所涉企的范围非常之广阔,其包摄的内容亦极其之宏富,远远不止所谓的"一体三位"。况且,中国梦本身乃是一个不断发展的、开放的思想-理论体系,随着实践的深化,中国梦的思想-理论体系也在不断充实。藉此之故,将中国梦"理论体系"(科学思想体系)归结为"一体三位",显然过于简单化了,其他诸多丰富的内容都被遮蔽掉了,其片面性是很明显的。

The current theoretical-academic circles have different viewpoints as to whether "Chinese Dream" can be regarded as an ideological-theoretical system. Mr. Shi Zhongquan, a representative scholar, explicitly opposes the idea that "Chinese dream is a theoretical system", while Mr. Luo Zhenjian and Mr. Cheng Meidong advocate that Chinese dream is a "theoretical system"("scientific ideological system"). Unfortunately, both Mr. Luo and Mr. Cheng simply attribute the "theoretical system"("scientific ideological system") of "Chinese dream" to "trinity", which is rather incomplete because the scope of the enterprises involved in the ideological-theoretical system of the "Chinese dream" is very broad, and the content it contains is extremely rich, thus extends far beyond the so-called "trinity". Besides, "Chinese dream" itself is a continuously developing and open ideological-theoretical system. With the rapid progess of our country, the ideological-theoretical system of the Chinese dream is also continuously enriched. Therefore, "trinity" is a simplistic term and covers many other rich contents.