摘要
通过采用网络调查法和比较分析法,调查美国图书馆协会认可的50所院校和我国36所“985”与“211”院校的LIS硕士专业及其研究方向与课程设置,然后从两国专业设置、研究方向以及课程设置三方面探讨其异同。借鉴美国LIS硕士专业与课程设置经验,提出改进我国LIS硕士专业与课程设置的一些建议。
By use of methods of network investigation and comparative analysis,this paper investigates the basic situation of LIS master's specialties and its research directions and curriculum settings by 50 colleges and universities authorized by ALA and 36 Chinese"985"and"211"colleges and universities,and discusses their similarities and differences among two countries'specialty settings,research directions and curriculum settings.Some suggestions on how to improve the LIS master's specialty and curriculum settings in our country are put forward by reference of American LIS master's specialty and curriculum settings.
作者
盛小平
苏红霞
SHENG Xiao-ping;SU Hong-xia(School of Library,Information and Archives,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444;Guangdong Urban&Rural Planning And Design Institute,Guangzhou 510200)
出处
《科技情报研究》
2019年第1期75-83,共9页
Scientific Information Research
基金
广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划2017年度学科共建项目“大数据环境下的信息资源管理学科建设与人才培养机制研究”(编号:GD17XTS05)
关键词
LIS
硕士专业
课程设置
比较分析
美国
中国
lis
master's degree
curriculum setting
comparative analysis
USA
China