摘要
典权制度是我国土生土长的物权制度,对于典权存废学界一直存在争议。典权存废之争的实质是关于法律继承与移植的不同态度,从辩证角度来看,典权的存在有其客观条件和现实土壤。与不动产质权、担保用益、买回合同制度相比,典权有其自身优势,更加契合我国社会发展和民族需要。典权可以破除我国农村土地“三权分置”的理论困境,在农村房屋流转和土地流转上发挥作用。
As a native property right system in China,the institution of pawning right has always been controversial in the academic field.The essence of the dispute is about the different attitudes of legal inheritance and transplantation.From the dialectical point of view,the existence of the pawning right has its objective conditions and realistic soil.Compared with the system of pledge of real estate,the secured use and repurchase contract,the pawning right has its own advantages,which is more in line with China's social development and national needs.It can break the dilemma of rural land circulation in China and play a role in the circulation of rural houses and land.
作者
张舒梦
张学文
ZHANG Shu-meng;ZHANG Xue-wen(Law school,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou Fujian 350116;Fujian Academy of Social Sciences,Fuzhou Fujian 350001)
出处
《华北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2019年第6期25-31,共7页
Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
典权
三权分置
农村土地
农村房屋
pawning right
separation of the three rights
the rural land
rural houses