期刊文献+

认同、认知与实践:当代西方族性研究的三种路径 被引量:3

Identity,Cognition and Practice: The Three Approaches of Ethnicity Studies in the Contemporary West
原文传递
导出
摘要 当代西方学界在族性研究方面存在认同、认知与实践三种路径,它们相互影响并不断衍生为新的理论体系。族群认同理论关注族性的生成机制,为族群意识产生的宏观社会学分析提供便利;“认知转向”批判族群认同理论的群体性和同质性倾向,以全新的族性概念开拓微观研究视域;实践视角注重权力关系讨论,试图以“整体观”描述社会场域中族性的变迁规律。族性是一个社会分类的工具性概念,鉴于中西方社会结构方面存在“关系化”与“类别化”逻辑的差异,应在本土经验上发展适应中国性质的族群研究相关概念和理论,促进族群理论的“中国化”。 There are three approaches of ethnicity studies in the Contemporary Western academia,namely identity,cognition and practice,which interact with each other and constantly produce new theoretical systems.The theory on ethnic identity focuses on the generation mechanism of ethnicity,which facilitates macro-sociologic analysis of collective consciousness;the“cognitive turn”criticizes the“groupness”and homogeneity trend found in ethnic identity theory,thus opening up a microscopic research field with a new definition of ethnicity;the practical perspective calls attention to the analysis of power relations,and attempts to explain the phenomenon of ethnicity change with a holistic approach in the social field.Ethnicity is an instrumental concept of social classification,and in view of the difference with the“relational”and“categorical”logic in social structures between China and Western countries,it is necessary to construct relevant concepts and theories adapted to Chinese ethnic studies based on indigenous experiences,so as to promote the“sinicization”of ethnic theories.
作者 张先清 段云兰 Xianqing Zhang;Yunlan Duan
出处 《世界民族》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期45-53,共9页 Journal of World Peoples Studies
基金 笔者主持的国家社会科学基金重大项目“闽台海洋民俗文化遗产资源调查与研究”(13&ZD143) 贵州师范大学贵州省教育厅高等学校人文社会科学研究基地自主招标课题(2018jd035) 厦门大学研究生田野调查基金课题(2016GF012)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献66

  • 1杨宜音.自我及其边界:文化价值取向角度的研究进展[J].国外社会科学,1998(6):25-29. 被引量:17
  • 2翟学伟.中国人际关系的特质——本土的概念及其模式[J].社会学研究,1993(4):74-83. 被引量:178
  • 3杨国枢 见杨国枢 余安邦主编.《中国人的社会取向:社会互动的观点》[A].见杨国枢、余安邦主编.《中国人的心理与行为——观念及方法篇》[C].台北桂冠图书公司,1993年版..
  • 4孙隆基.《中国文化的深层结构》.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004年.第145-168,340-342页.
  • 5C.-Y.Chiu and Y.-Y. Hong, Social Psychology of Culture, New York: Psychology Press, 2006, pp. 14-46.
  • 6G. Hofstede, Culture's Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
  • 7H. C. Triandis, "Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Study of Collectivism and Individualism, " in U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi and G. Yoon, eds., Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications, 1994, pp. 41-65.
  • 8杨中芳.《中国人真的是“集体主义”的吗?--试论中国文化的价值体系》.杨国枢主编.《中国人的价值观--社会科学的观点》.台北:桂冠图书公司,1994年.
  • 9D. Oyserman, et al., “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses, ” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 128, no. 1, 2002, pp. 3-72.
  • 10M. B. Brewer and Chen Y-R., "Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism'? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism," PsychologicalReview, vol. 114, no. 1, 2007, pp. 133-151.

共引文献183

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部