期刊文献+

基于云理论和前景理论的高校体育教学质量优选

The Optimization of College Physical Education Teaching Quality Based on Cloud Theory and Prospect Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决高校体育教学质量参差不齐的问题,文章采用云理论和前景理论对高校体育教学质量进行优选,构建综合前景决策模型.选取云南省9所高等院校为研究对象,得到9所高校体育教学质量前景值排序E>G>I>A>D>F>C>B>H,其中E校的前景值最高,H校的前景值最低.分析前景值前三名并结合量化评价结果得出E校、I校体育教学课堂常规和教师教学态度量化值较高,但G校量化值较高项均与其他2所学校不同,说明云南省高校体育教学质量存在较大差异,各个高校体育教学课程实施方案有所差别.借鉴优选出的学校并结合自身特点进行体育教学改革是提高高校体育教学质量的重要途径. In order to solve the problem of uneven quality of physical education in colleges and universities,the paper adopts cloud theory and prospect theory to optimize the quality of physical education in colleges and universities,and constructs a comprehensive decision-making model,and selects 9 institutions of higher learning in Yunnan Province as research objects,thus obtaining 9 The ranking of college PE teaching quality prospects is E>G>I>A>D>F>C>B>H,in which E school has the highest foreground value and H school has the lowest foreground value.The top three values of the analysis and the quantitative evaluation results show that the E-school and I school physical education classroom routines and teachers'teaching attitudes have higher quantified values,but the higher G-quantitative values are different from the other two schools,indicating that the qualities of physical education in colleges and universities of Yunnan Province are quite different,and the implementation plans of physical education courses in different universities are also different.To carry out physical education reform by learning from the preferred schools and combining their own characteristics is an important way to improve the quality of physical education in colleges and universities.
作者 唐磊 张沙 TANG Lei;ZHANG Sha(College of Physical Education and Health,Chuxiong Normal University,Chuxiong,Yunnan 675000,China)
出处 《肇庆学院学报》 2019年第5期77-82,89,共7页 Journal of Zhaoqing University
关键词 云理论 前景理论 体育教学 优选 Cloud Theory Prospect Theory physical education teaching optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1张文华.大数据对体育教育的冲击[J].贵阳学院学报(自然科学版),2014,9(2):47-51. 被引量:19
  • 2王汉谰.教育评价学[M].郑州:河南大学出版社,1995:178.
  • 3国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[EB/OL].http://www.edu.cn/html/e/jiaoyuguihuagangyao.htm,2010-01-18.
  • 4董奇.促进教学的课堂评价[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2003..
  • 5Baucells Manel, Sarin Rakesh K. Group decisions with multiple criteria[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(8):1105-1118.
  • 6Hubber H E, Redmond J A, McDonald J R. Multi-attr ibute trade-off analysis applied to long-term generation planning[J]. IEEE Conf Publication, 1994, 388(2) :906-909.
  • 7Herrera F,Herrera-Viedma E,Verdegay J L.A linguistic decision processing in group decision process in group decision making[J]. Group Decision Negotiation, 1996, 31 (5):165-176.
  • 8Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information [J]. Fuzzy Set and Systems,2000, 115(1):67-82.
  • 9Cheng C H, Lin Y. Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation[J]. European J of Operational Research,2002,142(1).. 174-1869.
  • 10邸凯昌 李德仁 李德毅.语言云模型的扩展及其在空间数据挖掘中的应用[A]..第九届全国图像图形学术会议[C].西安,1998-5.521-526.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部