期刊文献+

“同意”与“公意”之辨——论实现人民主权的两种原则的区别、困境及融贯 被引量:1

Analysis of “Consent” and “General will”
原文传递
导出
摘要 同意原则和公意原则是实现人民主权的两种不同原则。以同意原则为前提的人民主权是把人民作为国家权力的终极来源,肯定了“权力”为人民所有和所赋。把符合公意作为实现人民主权的理想诉求,强调政治权力为公器,政治权力的使用要为民所用、为民所谋,要以实现人民的根本利益和福祉为根本目的。同意原则与公意原则的矛盾体现为权力的来源归属与权力行使的实践效果之间的矛盾。虽然两者之间存在着矛盾,但是并不意味着两者之间是完全对立的。只有把同意原则和公意原则有机地结合起来,才能最终协调每个人的自由发展与所有人的共同利益,基本善与共同善,个体善与公共善的和谐统一。 People's consent and general will are two different principles to realize people's sovereignty.The consent of the people's sovereignty is to regard the people as the ultimate source of state power,affirming that“power”is owned and endowed by the people.Taking the general will as the ideal appeal for realizing the people's sovereignty,the emphasis of political power as a public device,the political power used by the people and for the people must be fundamentally purposed to aim at the ultimateinterestandwell beingof the people.The fact that the principles of consent and generalwillarecontradicted is initially the expressionoftheconflictbetween the attribution of power and the actual exercise of power.That is to say,although the power belongs to the people,the exercise of power may not accord with the will of the people.Inspite of this contradiction between them,it does not mean that they are completely opposite.It is necessary to guarantee the realization of the sovereignty of the people by application of two principles.If we can conbinethis two principles we will coordinate the free development of individuals with the common interests of the people,the basic good with common good,and individual good with public good.
作者 孟锐峰 Meng Ruifeng(School of Marxism,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350)
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第11期99-108,共10页 Teaching and Research
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(项目号:91822043) 国家社科基金重大研究专项项目“建设具有强大凝聚力和引领力的社会主义意识形态研究”(项目号:18VZT004)的阶段性成果
关键词 同意原则 公意原则 人民主权 the principle of consent the principle of general will popular sovereignty
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1约翰·麦克里兰.西方政治思想史[M].海口:海南出版社,2003..
  • 2Jurgen Habennas. Richard Rorty's Pragmatic Turn [ A ]. In Rorty and His Critics [ C ]. Oxford:Blackwel1,2000.
  • 3周濂.道德评价国家的两条进路[J].年度学术,2004,(4).
  • 4A John Simmons. Justification and Legitimacy [J]. Ethics, 1999, (7).
  • 5Riley Patrick. Will and Political Legitimacy [M]. Manhattan: Harvard University Press , 1982.
  • 6TH Green.Lectures on the principles of political obligation[]..1941
  • 7de,Jouvenel,B. Sovereignty . 1957
  • 8J.-J.Rousseau.Histoire des Moeurs[].Political Writings.
  • 9Cassirer Ernst,trans.Gutmann,Kristeller,Randall.Rousseau,Kant and Gothe[]..1963
  • 10J.-J.Rousseau.Premiére Version du Contrat Social[].Political Writings.

共引文献17

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部