期刊文献+

创新与收获:独占策略研究综述与未来展望 被引量:2

Innovation and Appropriation: A Review and Prospect of Appropriation Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自1986年Teece率先提出创新获利问题以来,围绕该主题的研究日益繁荣,研究情境和结论也日趋多样化。然而,现有文献综述或因范围太宽而缺少细节,或因年限较早故无法反映最新成果。本综述的主题严格限定在企业独占策略有效性及其影响因素两个方面。通过精读25篇有代表性的文献发现,关于独占策略有效性的研究结论,其差异性程度超过一致性程度,而解释这种差异的变量又过于繁杂且概括性较低。因此,建议未来研究引入案例研究方法辅助构建独占策略与创新收益关系的理论框架;用客观的变量间关系检验代替主观意见调查法并将独占策略有效性影响因素视作调节变量,对其进一步精炼。 Since Teece pioneered the issue of profiting from innovation in 1986,research around this topic has become increasingly prosperous. Accordingly,research contexts and conclusions have become increasingly diversified. However,the existing review articles either lack details due to their wide range or not reflect the latest progress due to their earlier publication. The topic of this review is strictly limited to the effectiveness of various appropriation strategies and their influencing factors. By intensively investigating 25 representative literatures,it is found that the disparity on the effectiveness of given appropriate strategy exceeds the consistency,while the explanatory variables are too fine-grained and lack generality. Therefore,future researches should introduce case study as a supplementary method for constructing the theoretical framework about appropriate strategy and profiting,and replace the subjective opinion survey with objective inter-variable relationship examination and treat the factors affecting the effectiveness of appropriate strategy as moderators,further refine them.
作者 赵芸潼 杜玉申 刘梓毓 Zhao Yuntong;Du Yushen;Liu Ziyu(Business School,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
机构地区 吉林大学商学院
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第11期138-145,共8页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“基于社会网络分析方法的企业间网络结构对收益分配的影响研究”(16YJA630008)
关键词 创新获利 独占策略 有效性 影响因素 Profiting from innovation Appropriation strategy Effectiveness Influencing factor
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献69

  • 1SOMAYA D.Strategic Determinants of Decisions Not to Settle Patent Litigation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(11):17-38.
  • 2HALL B,ZIEDONIS H.An Empirical Analysis of Patent Litigation in the Semiconductors Industry[EB/OL].(2007-10-10)[2008-07-19].http://iber.berkeley.edu/cpc/Conference/conference-papers/Hall-Ziedonis-paper.pdf.
  • 3BYMA J,LEIPONEN A.Can't Block,Must Run:Small Firms and Appropriability[R].Mario:The Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies,2007.
  • 4ARUNDEL A.The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation[J].Research Policy,2001,30(4):611-624.
  • 5CINCERA M.Patents,R&D and Technological Spillovers at the Firm Level:Some Evidence from Econometric Count Models for Panel Data[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics,1997,12(3):265-280.
  • 6SATTLER H.Appropriability of Product Innovations:An Empirical Analysis for Germany[J].Technology Management,2003,26(5/6):502-516.
  • 7GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ N,NIETO-ANTOLIN M.Appropriability of Innovation Results:An Empirical Study in Spanish Manufacturing Firms[J].Technovation,2007,27(5):280-295.
  • 8CASSIMAN B,P(E)REZ-CASTRILLO D,VEUGE-LERS R.Endogenizing Know-how Flows Through the Nature of R&D Investments[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,2002,20(6):775-799.
  • 9GRAHAM S,SOMAYA D.Complementary Use of Patents,Copyrights and Trademarks by Software Firms:Evidence from Litigation[R].Copenhagen:Copenhagen Business School,2003.
  • 10HOUNSHELL D,SMITH J.Science and Corporate Strategy:Du Pont R&D,1902-1980[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1988.

共引文献2608

同被引文献35

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部