期刊文献+

十八大以来司法经费省级统管模式创新研究 被引量:3

Innovation of Provincial-level Administration Modes of Judicial Funds Since the 18th CPC National Congress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 省以下法院、检察院财物统一管理是党和国家机构改革的重要组成部分。十八大以来,根据省级统管主体的不同,省以下法院、检察院财物统一管理可以分为省级司法部门统管和省级财政部门统管两种模式。两种模式在经费管理模式、部门整合程度、独立保障程度等方面各有优劣。受制于信息、效率、环境等因素,在改革试点中出现了两种模式融合的现象。作为司法机构与职能体系创新的重要组成部分,司法部门也出现了一些整合法院、检察院内外利害关系人共同参与的组织设置。进一步深化司法经费管理体制改革,要更新理念,以更加尊重司法规律的方式加强司法经费管理的内部组织;革新机制,大力提升司法经费管理过程的开放性和回应性;拓展议程,着力构建司法部门与行政机关、权力机关之间的良性互动机制。 The unified administration of property of courts and procuratorates below the provincial level constitutes an important part of the reform of the Party and state institutions.Since the 18th CPC National Congress,the provincial-level unified administration subjects are in two modes:the unified administration of provincial-level judicial departments and that of provincial-level financial departments.The two models have their own advantages and disadvantages in fund administration,department integration and independence guarantee.Due to various information,efficiency,environments and other factors,there exists a phenomenon that the two modes integrate in the reform pilots.As an important part of the innovation of judicial institutions and functional systems,the judicial departments have set up some organizations,allowing the common participation of all the stakeholders of courts and procuratorates.To deepen the reform of the administration system of judicial funds,we should update our ideas and strengthen the internal organization of judicial fund administration by observing the judiciary law,reform the mechanism to advance the openness and responsiveness of the process of the administration,and expand the agenda to vigorously build a positive interaction mechanism among the judiciary,executive and authoritative departments.
作者 张洪松 ZHANG Hong-song(School of Marxism,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610065,China)
出处 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期148-154,共7页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目“中国司法经费管理体制改革研究”(14CFX021) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(18LZU JBWZY039)
关键词 机构改革 司法经费 省级统管 省级司法部门统管 省级财政部门统管 institutional reform judicial funds provincial-level administration unified administration by provincial-level judicial departments unified administration by provincial-level financial departments
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献97

  • 1贺卫方.中国司法管理制度的两个问题[J].中国社会科学,1997(6):116-129. 被引量:278
  • 2马骏驹,聂德宗.当前我国司法制度存在的问题与改进对策[J].法学评论,1998,16(6):25-39. 被引量:97
  • 3刘会生.人民法院管理体制改革的几点思考[J].法学研究,2002,24(3):12-20. 被引量:56
  • 4王胜俊.《最高人民法院工作报告--2010年3月11日在第十一届全国人民代表大会第三次会议上》.
  • 5Hudzik, J. K. , Court Budgeting: Judicial Branch Independence and Accountability. J. Rabin and T. A. Wachhaus. Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis ,2008 ), pp. 435 -441.
  • 6Baar,C. , Separate but Subservient: Court Budgeting in the American State. (New York: Lexington Books, 1975 ), p. 18.
  • 7Hazard, G. C. , M. B. McNamara, et al. , Court Finance and Unitary Budgeting, 81 YaleL. J. 1286 (1972).
  • 8Hudzik, J. K. , Financing and Managing the Finances of the California Court System:Alternative Futures. 66 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1813 (1993).
  • 9Baar,C. , Separate but Subservient: Court Budgeting in the American State, pp. 119 -120.
  • 10Tobin, R. W. and J. K. Hudzik, The Status and Future of State Financing of Courts, S. W. Hays and J. Cole Blease Gra- ham, Handbook of Court Administration and Management (New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc. , 1993).

共引文献167

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部