期刊文献+

梨果套袋及常用清洗方式对农药残留去除效果研究 被引量:4

Removal effect of pesticide residue in pear by bagging and different rinsing modes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究套袋模式以及常用清洗方式对梨果中农药残留去除敁果。方法在套袋与不套袋梨树上施用6种农药(毒死蜱、高敁氯氰菊酯、苯醚甲环唑、戊唑醇、多菌灵、吡虫啉),采摘期分别取样,非套袋梨果用4种方式(清水、盐水、苏打水、洗涤精)清洗,对比套袋与不套袋,4种方式清洗与不清洗梨果中农药残留量。结果套袋梨果对比不套袋农药去除率为43%~96%。4种清洗方式相比不清洗的去除率为44%~88%。结论套袋以及4种清洗方式均能有敁去除农药残留,但存在一定差异,苏打水清洗去除梨果农药残留敁果最佳。 Objective To investigate the effects of bagging cultivation model and different rinsing modes on removing pesticide residue in pear. Methods Pears with bagging and no bagging cultivation model were sprayed with chlorpyrifos, beta-cypermethrin, difenoconazole, tebuconazole, carbendazim and imidacloprid, and picked during harvest period, for no bagging pears were cleaned with water, salt water, soda water and detergent respectively. The pesticide residues in bagged and non-bagged, uncleaned samples and cleaned by 4 methods were detected and compared. Results The pesticide residue removal rate in pear of bagging and no bagging was 43%-96%, and 44%-88% of uncleaned samples and cleaned by 4 methods. Conclusion The bagging method and 4 cleaning methods can efficiently remove pesticide residues in pears and have different removal efficiency. Among all 4 kinds of rising methods, soda water is the most effective method.
作者 陈勇达 张少军 CHEN Yong-Da;ZHANG Shao-Jun(Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Shijiazhuang),Ministry of Agriculture,Shijiazhuang 050051,China)
出处 《食品安全质量检测学报》 CAS 2019年第20期6944-6949,共6页 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
基金 农业部农产品质量安全监管局项目(GJFP201600303)~~
关键词 梨果 套袋 清洗方式 去除率 农药残留 pear bagging rinsing modes removal rate pesticide residue
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

二级参考文献234

共引文献208

同被引文献75

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部