期刊文献+

An integrated optimization and simulation approach for air pollution control under uncertainty in open-pit metal mine 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 Open-pit metal mines contribute toward air pollution and without effective control techniques manifests the risk of violation of environmental guidelines. This paper establishes a stochastic approach to conceptualize the air pollution control model to attain a sustainable solution. The model is formulated for decision makers to select the least costly treatment method using linear programming with a defined objective function and multi-constraints. Furthermore, an integrated fuzzy based risk assessment approach is applied to examine uncertainties and evaluate an ambient air quality systematically. The applicability of the optimized model is explored through an open-pit metal mine case study, in North America. This method also incorporates the meteorological data as input to accommodate the local conditions. The uncertainties in the inputs, and predicted concentration are accomplished by probabilistic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation method. The output results are obtained to select the cost-effective pollution control technologies for PM2.5, PM10, NOx, SO2 and greenhouse gases. The risk level is divided into three types (loose, medium and strict) using a triangular fuzzy membership approach based on different environmental guidelines. Fuzzy logic is then used to identify environmental risk through stochastic simulated cumulative distribution functions of pollutant concentration. Thus, an integrated modeling approach can be used as a decision tool for decision makers to select the cost-effective technology to control air pollution.
出处 《Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2019年第5期101-114,共14页 环境科学与工程前沿(英文)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1Brian J R,Wayland E,Ranjithan S,1994.Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem[J].Water Resources Research,30(5):1589-1603.
  • 2Charnes A,W W Cooper,1959.Chance-constrained programming[J].Management Science,6:73-79.
  • 3Charnes A,W W Cooper,1961.Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisfying under change constraints[J].Journal of the American Statistical.Association,57:134-148.
  • 4Daniel H L,S Ranji R,John W B et al.,2000.Application of genetic algorithms for the design of ozone control strategies[J].Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association,50(6):1050-1063.
  • 5Daniel S E,D C Diakoulaki,C P Pappis,1997.Operations research and environmental planning [J].European Journal of Operational Research,102:248-263.
  • 6Ellis J H,E A Mcbean,G J Farquhar,1985.Chance-constrained/ stochastic linear programming model for acid rain abatement-I.Complete colineariy and noncolinaerity[J].Atmosphere Environment,19(6):925-937.
  • 7Ellis J H,E AMcbean,G J Farquhar,1986.Chance-constrained/stochastic linear programming model for acid rain abatement-Ⅱ.Limited colinerarity[J].Atmosphere Environment,20(3),501-511.
  • 8Fronza G,P Melli,1984.Assignment of emission abatement levels by stochastic programming[J].Atmosphere Environment,18(3):531-535.
  • 9Goldberg D E,1989.Genetic algorithms in search,optimization,and machine leafing[M].Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley.
  • 10Greenberg H J,1995.Mathematical programming models for envrionmental quality control[J].Operations Research,43 (4) :579-593.

共引文献4

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部