期刊文献+

超声及超声造影对卵巢良恶性肿瘤的诊断价值研究 被引量:6

Diagnostic value of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in benign and malignant ovarian tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声及超声造影对卵巢良恶性肿瘤的诊断价值。方法选取58例卵巢恶性肿瘤患者和34例卵巢良性肿瘤患者。比较卵巢良恶性肿瘤的超声检查相关指标和超声造影特征,计算和分析超声及超声造影对卵巢恶性肿瘤的诊断价值,包括灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确度。结果与卵巢良性肿瘤相比,卵巢恶性肿瘤的Alaczar超声评分和中心血流比例较高,阻力指数(RI)较低,超声造影开始增强时间、增强峰值时间和平均通过时间较短,增强峰值强度和增强曲线下面积较大(P﹤0.05)。超声及超声造影诊断卵巢恶性肿瘤的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确度分别为86.2%、88.2%、92.6%、78.9%和87.0%。结论超声及超声造影对卵巢恶性肿瘤的诊断价值较高,有助于对卵巢良恶性肿瘤进行鉴别诊断。 Objective To explore the diagnostic value of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in benign and malignant ovarian tumors.Method Fifty-eight patients with malignant ovarian tumor and thirty-four patients with benign ovarian tumor were selected.The ultrasonic related indicators and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography features of benign and malignant ovarian tumors were compared,the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in benign and malignant ovarian tumors was analyzed,including sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,accuracy were calculated and analyzed.Result Compared with benign ovarian tumors,the Alaczar ultrasound score and the ratio of central blood flow were higher,the resistance index(RI)in malignant ovarian tumors was lower,initial enhancement time,peak enhancement time and mean transit time were shorter,peak enhancement intensity and area under enhancement curve were stronger and larger(P<0.05).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in detecting malignant ovarian tumors were 86.2%,88.2%,92.6%,78.9%and 87.0%respectively.Conclusion The diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in malignant ovarian tumors is high,which is helpful in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
作者 陈倩 孙国娟 CHEN Qian;SUN Guojuan(Department of Gynecology,Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Chengdu 610072,Sichuan,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2019年第20期2448-2450,2454,共4页 Oncology Progress
关键词 超声造影 卵巢恶性肿瘤 诊断 灵敏度 特异度 contrast-enhanced ultrasonography malignant ovarian tumor diagnosis sensitivity specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献92

  • 1饶丽萍,关若丽.阴道超声对复发性卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿治疗的临床价值[J].北京医学,2007,29(1):22-24. 被引量:15
  • 2张诗武,郭华,张丹芳,谷彦军,赵秀兰,孙保存.黑色素瘤组织内三种血液供应模式时间关系的初步探讨[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(2):96-99. 被引量:14
  • 3ALCDZAR J L, ROYO P, JURADO M, et al. Triage for surgical management of ovarian tumors in asymptomatic women : assessment of an ultrasound - based scoring system [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32 (2) : 220 - 225.
  • 4ALCDZAR J L, MERCE L T, LAPARTE C, et al. A new scoring system to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 188(3) : 685 -692.
  • 5孙丽娟,吴青,陈焰,等.超声评分术前评价卵巢肿物良恶性及辅助术式的选择的研究[J].中华超声医学杂志(电子版),2010,7(4):29-32.
  • 6TIMMERMAN D, VALENTIN L, BOURNE T H, et al. Terms deftnitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International O- varian Tumor Analysis ( IOTA ) Group [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gy- necol, 2000, 16(5): 500-505.
  • 7LERNER J R, TIMOR I E, FEDERMAN A, et al. Transvaginal uhrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an im- proved, weighted scoring system [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 170(1 Pt 1) : 81 -85.
  • 8MAJEED H, RAMZAN A, IMRAN F, et al. Validity of resistive index for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses[ J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2011, 61 (11) : 1104 -1107.
  • 9PEGGY G, KIRSTEN K, EVELIEN M, et al. Evaluation of Ad- nexal masses with three- dimensional ultrasonography[J]. Obstet Gyneeol, 2006, 108(5): 1167-1175.
  • 10Majeed H,Ramzan A, Imran F, et al. Validity of resistive index for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian masses[J]. J Pak Med Assoc,2011,61(11) :1104.

共引文献164

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部