期刊文献+

腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术中右美托咪定麻醉效果及对术后血流动力学、疼痛视觉模拟评分及Ramsay镇静评分的影响 被引量:84

Anesthetic effect of dexmedetomidine in laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy and its influence on hemodynamics,visual analogue scale and Ramsay sedation score after operation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨右美托咪定在腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术中的麻醉效果及对患者术后血流动力学、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Ramsay镇静评分的影响。方法选择2017年3月至6月山西省肿瘤医院在全身静脉麻醉下行胃癌D2根治术患者86例,应用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组43例。观察组在全身静脉麻醉诱导前静脉泵注0.6μg/kg右美托咪定,15 min后剂量改为0.4μg/kg,于手术结束前30 min停用;对照组给予等量0.9%氯化钠注射液。比较两组麻醉诱导前(T1)、气管插管时(T2)、插管后(T3)、切片时(T4)、拔管后即刻(T5)的平均动脉压(MAP)及心率变化,术后1 h及4 h的VAS和Ramsay镇静评分,术中麻醉维持药物的用量。结果观察组T1、T3~T5时的心率、MAP均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组术后1、4 h的VAS、Ramsay评分均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。观察组术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼用量分别为(964±251)mg、(3.1±0.8)mg,均少于对照组[(1485±425)mg、(4.8±0.8)mg],差异均有统计学意义(t=9.913,P<0.01;t=9.834,P<0.01)。结论右美托咪定在腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术麻醉中可减少患者的应激反应,增强镇静镇痛效果,减少丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼的使用量,临床应用价值较高。 Objective To analyze the anesthetic effect of dexmedetomidine in laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy and its influence on hemodynamics,visual analogue scale(VAS)and Ramsay sedation score after operation.Methods A total of 86 patients who received laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy under general intravenous anesthesia in Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital from March 2017 to June 2017 were enrolled,and all the patients were divided into two groups by using random number table method.The observation group(43 cases)was intravenously injected with dexmedetomidine(0.6μg/kg)before induction of general anesthesia,and the dose was changed to 0.4μg/kg after 15 min with drug withdrawal till 30 minutes before surgery,the control group(43 cases)was given an equal volume of 0.9%normal saline.The mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate change before anesthetic induction(T1),tracheal intubation time(T2),after intubation(T3),section time(T4)and the immediate time after intubation(T5)were compared between the two groups.The VAS and Ramsay scores at 1 h and 4 h after surgery and the intraoperative doses of anesthesia maintenance drugs were also compared between the two groups.Results The heart rate and MAP of the observation group were lower than those of the control group at the time of T1,T3-T5,the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The VAS and Ramsay scores of the observation group were better than those of the control group at 1 h and 4 h after operation,and the differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).The intraoperative doses of propofol and remifentanil in the observation group were(964±251)mg and(3.1±0.8)mg,respectively,which were less than those in the control group[(1485±425)mg and(4.8±0.8)mg],the differences were statistically significant(t=9.913,P<0.01;t=9.834,P<0.01).Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can reduce the stress response of patients with laparoscopic D2 radical anesthesia,enhance the sedative effect,and reduce the dosage of propofol and remifentanil,therefore,it has high clinical application value.
作者 白日虹 贾志勇 张晓婷 朱毅 赵艳丽 赵丽 张勤功 Bai Rihong;Jia Zhiyong;Zhang Xiaoting;Zhu Yi;Zhao Yanli;Zhao Li;Zhang Qingong(Department of Anesthesiology,Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital,Taiyuan 030013,China)
出处 《肿瘤研究与临床》 CAS 2019年第10期666-669,共4页 Cancer Research and Clinic
关键词 胃肿瘤 胃切除术 腹腔镜检查 淋巴结切除术 血流动力学 右美托咪定 疼痛测定 RAMSAY镇静评分 Stomach neoplasms Gastrectomy Laparoscopy Lymph node excision Hemodynamics Dexmedetomidine Pain measurement Ramsay sedation score
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献54

  • 1徐建国.手术后恶心呕吐的防治[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(7):556-558. 被引量:147
  • 2Woodforde JM,Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain[J].{H}Journal of Psychosomatic Research,1972,(03):173-178.
  • 3Jensen MP,Chen C,Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores:a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain[J].{H}Journal of Pain,2003,(07):407-414.
  • 4Gallagher E J,Liebman M,Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):633-638.
  • 5Gallagher E J,Bijur PE,Latimer C. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2002,(04):287-290.
  • 6Fosnocht DE,Chapman CR,Swanson ER. Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2005,(01):55-59.
  • 7Grilo RM,Treves R,Preux PM. Clinically relevant VAS pain score change in patients with acute rheumatic conditions[J].{H}Joint Bone Spine:Revue du Rhumatisme,2007,(04):358-361.
  • 8Bird SB,Dickson EW. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):639-643.
  • 9Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain[J].{H}EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL,2001,(03):205-207.
  • 10Emshoff R,Emshoff I,Bertram S. Estimation of clinically important change for visual analog scales measuring chronic temporomandibular disorder pain[J].{H}Journal of Orofacial Pain,2010,(03):262-269.

共引文献788

同被引文献884

引证文献84

二级引证文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部