期刊文献+

D2-40和Prox1在弥漫性躯体性血管角化瘤及行性血管瘤中的表达差异 被引量:2

Difference in expression of lymphatic markers D2-40 and Prox1 between angiokeratoma corporis diffusum and angioma serpiginosum
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨淋巴管标记在弥漫性躯体性血管角化瘤(ACD)及匐行性血管瘤(AS)鉴别诊断中的意义.方法回顾性分析2006-2017年西京皮肤医院确诊的9例ACD及6例AS患者的临床及组织病理学特点.对所有病例皮损均行CD31、D2-40及Prox1染色.结果9例ACD患者的异常脉管CD31呈弱阳性或阴性;ACD皮损异常管腔内皮细胞4例D2-40局灶阳性,5例D2-40阴性,9例Prox1阳性.6例AS患者增生的小血管内皮CD31阳性,而D2-40和Prox1均阴性.结论少数ACD及AS患者的临床特征有相似性,淋巴管标记在二者的鉴别诊断中具有明确的意义. Objective To investigate the significance of lymphatic markers in the differential diagnosis of angiokeratoma corporis diffusum(ACD)and angioma serpiginosum(AS).Methods Totally,9 patients with ACD and 6 with AS were enrolled from Department of Dermatology,Xijing Hospital between 2006 and 2017,and their clinical and histopathological features were retrospectively analyzed.Skin sections from all the patients were stained for CD31,D2-40 and Prox1.Results In the 9 patients with ACD,abnormal vessels were weakly positive or negative for CD31,and positive for Prox1.Endothelial cells in abnormal vessels were locally positive for D2-40 in 4 patients with ACD,but negative for D2-40 in the other 5 patients.In the 6 patients with AS,the endothelia of hyperplastic small vessels were positive for CD31,but negative for D2-40 and Prox1.Conclusion The clinical features of a few patients with ACD are similar to those of patients with AS,and lymphatic markers have definite significance in the differential diagnosis of the two diseases.
作者 顾安康 陈凤鸣 王雷 Gu Ankang;Chen Fengming;Wang Lei(Department of Dermatology,Xijing Hospital,Fourth Military Medical University,Xi′an 710032,China;Department of Pathology,Tianjin Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital,Tianjin 300120,China)
出处 《中华皮肤科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第11期817-820,共4页 Chinese Journal of Dermatology
关键词 血管瘤 淋巴管瘤 抗原 CD31 诊断 鉴别 弥漫性躯体性血管角化瘤 D2-40 Prox1 Hemangioma Lymphangioma Antigens CD31 Diagnosis differential Angiokeratoma corporis diffusum D2-40 Prox1
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1朱学骏,王宝玺,孙建方,等.皮肤病学[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2011:482-486.
  • 2Katta R, Wagner A. Angioma serpiginosum with extensive cutaneous involvement [J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2000.42(2 Pt 2): 384-385.
  • 3Chen JH, Wang KH, Hu CH, et al. Atypical angioma serpiginosum [J]. Yonsei Med J, 2008, 49(3):509-513.
  • 4Sandhu K, Gupta S. Angioma serpiginosum: report of two unusual cases [J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2005, 19(1):127-128.
  • 5Houge G, Oeffner F, Grzeschik KH. An Xp 11.23 deletion containing PORCN may also cause angioma serpiginosum, a cosmetic skin disease associated with extreme skewing of X-inactivation [J]. Eur J Hum Genet, 2008, 16(9): 1027-1028.
  • 6Happle R. Angioma serpiginosum is not caused by PORCN mutations [J]. Eur J Hum Genet, 2009, 17(7):881-882.
  • 7董秀芹,王红燕,方俊华,梁倩雯,黄新霞,何志琴.匐行性血管瘤10例的激光治疗[J].中国美容医学,2009,18(5):682-683. 被引量:2

同被引文献29

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部