《选择法院协议公约》对法治全球治理的影响研究——以诉讼和国际仲裁的管辖冲突为视角

RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS ON GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: BASED ON JURISDICTIONAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION

从2015年《选择法院协议公约》生效后诉讼与仲裁在国际民商事争议解决中可能发生的管辖冲突角度,研究了《公约》对法治全球治理的影响。《公约》易使管辖协议的“双重选择”问题引发复杂的平行程序和冲突性裁决,并加剧裁判竞争,助长诉讼策略的滥用,从而降低执行效率;《公约》并没有充分解决诉讼、仲裁的管辖冲突问题,限制了其在国际司法合作上的影响力。由于《公约》在国际司法领域的这种不确定性,不仅国际诉讼难以冲击国际商事仲裁的优势地位,法治全球治理效果也得不到有效的提升。

It is discussed in this article that since the Convention on the Choice of Court Agreements came into force in 2015,it has an impact on global governance in terms of the rule of law,from the perspective of possible jurisdictional conflicts between international litigation and arbitration in civil and commercial dispute settlement.The conclusion is drawn that the double choices of jurisdiction protocols of the Convention are prone to complicated parallel procedures and conflicting rulings,which then aggravates the judging competition and abuses the litigation tactics,thus lowering the efficiency of enforcement.The Convention does not adequately solve the jurisdictional conflicts between international litigations and arbitrations,which restricts the international judicial cooperation.Due to the uncertainties of the Convention in international law enforcement,the international litigation can hardly play its role in competition with international commercial arbitration.And global governance in terms of the rule of law can hardly improve effectively.