期刊文献+

HPV分型检测与TCT检测在宫颈病变筛查中的对比分析 被引量:2

Comparative analysis of HPV typing and TCT in cervical lesion screening
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨HPV分型检测与TCT检测在宫颈病变中的筛查价值。方法:选取HPV分型阳性患者和/或TCT阳性患者共1927例,均进行阴道镜及宫颈活检术。以宫颈活检结果即病理组织学检查为金标准,回顾性分HPV分型检测与TCT检测在宫颈病变筛查中的应用效果。结果:HPV分型检测的灵敏度为85.25%(185/217),漏诊率为14.75%(32/217),而TCT检测的灵敏度为76.96%,漏诊率为23.04%(50/217),两组灵敏度比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.87,P<0.05),两组漏诊率比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.87,P<0.05)。结论:HPV分型检测较TCT检测有更好的灵敏度,且漏诊率低,有望成为宫颈癌筛查的主要手段。 Objective:To investigate the screening value of HPV classification and TCT in cervical lesions.Methods:1927 patients of HPV positive and/or TCT positive were selected to test.Retrospective results of HPV classification test and TCT test in screening cervical lesions were obtained by using the results of cervical biopsy,namely pathological histology test,as gold standard.Results:The sensitivity of HPV was 85.25%(185/217),the rate of missed diagnosis was 14.75%(32/217),while the sensitivity of TCT was 76.96%and the rate of missed diagnosis was 23.04%(50/217).The difference in sensitivity between the two groups has statistically significantce(χ^2 value was 4.87,P<0.05)The difference in the rate of missed diagnosis between the two groups has statistically significance(χ^2 value was 4.87,P<0.05).Conclusion:HPV classification detection has better sensitivity than TCT detection,and the rate of missed diagnosis is low,which is expected to be the main method of cervical cancer screening.
作者 杨慧红 杨永彬 王小云 姚华惠 Yang Huihong;Yang Yongbin;Wang Xiaoyun;Yao Huahui(Yong feng Community Health Service Center,Song jiang District,Shanghai 201600;Shanghai First People’s Hospital,Shanghai 201600;Shanghai Song Jiang Community Health Service Center,Shanghai 201600)
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2019年第21期1-2,44,共3页 Women's Health Research
关键词 HPV分型检测 TCT检测 对比分析 Detection of HPV typing TCT detection Comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1张洁文,王建捷,蔺莉,朱玉凤,殷秀琴.高频电波刀电圈切除术治疗宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的效果[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(3):225-227. 被引量:11
  • 2史健,郑军生,尹方,胡维维,黄小军,周小丽.宫颈上皮内瘤变p16、p53、Ki-67的表达与高危型HPV感染及其临床意义[J].南方医科大学学报,2007,27(4):515-517. 被引量:20
  • 3Renshaw AA, Young NAB, lrdsong GG et al. Comparision of performance of conventional and thinp rep gynecologic preparation in the college of American Pathologists Gynecobgic Cytology Program [J].Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2004, 128:1.
  • 4Howard D J, Lund VJ. The role of midfacial degloving in modern rhinological practice [J] . J Laryngol Otol, 1999, 113:885.
  • 5Perry KU, Menton S, Menton Met al. Inclusion of HPV testing in routine cervical cancer screening for woman above 29 years in Gernany : results for 8466 patients [J] . Br J Cancer, 2003, 88 (10) : 1570.
  • 6Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Estimating the world cancer burden : Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer,2001,94 : 153 - 156.
  • 7Siemens FC, Boon ME, Kuypers JC, et al. Population-based cervical screening with a 5-year interval in the Netherlands. Stabilization of the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions in the screened population. Acta Cytol, 2004,48 ( 3 ) : 348 - 354.
  • 8Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancerworldwide. J Pathol, 1999,189 ( 1 ) : 12 - 19.
  • 9Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance:baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst,2001,93:293 - 299.
  • 10Wright TC Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS,et al. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA, 2002,287:2120 - 2129.

共引文献59

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部