期刊文献+

基于双边进口需求弹性的中美经贸摩擦福利损失测算 被引量:22

Calculation of Welfare Losses from Sino-US Economic and Trade Frictions Based on Bilateral Import Demand Elasticities
原文传递
导出
摘要 近期中美经贸摩擦不断升级,加征关税重新成为贸易保护的手段,关税保护及其福利效应再次成为学界研究热点。本文将估算进口需求弹性的方法推广到双边层面,利用123个国家或地区2000-2016年HS6进口品数据,对双边进口需求弹性和贸易限制指数进行估算,并重点评估了中美经贸摩擦的福利损失。结果显示:中国总体进口需求弹性平均值为-1.79。基于双边弹性和关税测算的贸易限制指数值低于利用多边关税测算的值,这表明已有文献高估了中国的贸易保护程度。此外,中美经贸摩擦可使中美贸易顺差下降975.45亿美元,同时使中美两国无谓损失分别增加25.70亿美元和79.49亿美元。情景模拟显示,中国对美国加征关税时未完全考虑关税结构,美国征税改善贸易不平衡的边际效应在下降。 With the recent continuous escalation of Sino-US economic and trade frictions,increasing tariffs have become a means of trade protection.Tariff protection and its welfare effects have therefore once again become research hotspots.This paper expands the method of estimating import demand elasticities developed by Kee et al.(2008)at the bilateral level,estimating China's bilateral import demand elasticities and the trade restrictiveness index by using HS-6 import products data from 123 countries from between 2000 and 2016,and focusing on assessing welfare losses from the Sino-US economic and trade frictions.The results of this paper show that:①the overall average elasticity of Chinese imports is-1.79,and the value of trade restrictiveness indices based on the bilateral elasticities and tariffs estimate is lower than the estimate using multilateral tariffs,indicating that the literature has overestimated the extent of China's trade protection;②Sino-US trade frictions have caused the Sino-US trade surplus to fall by US$97.55bn,while increasing the deadweight losses of China and the United States by US$2.57bn and US$7.95bn respectively;and③scenario simulations show that China does not fully consider the tariff structure when tariffs are imposed,while the marginal effect of the increased trade imbalance caused by the United States'tariff increase is declining.
作者 王晓星 倪红福 Wang Xiaoxing;Ni Hongfu
出处 《世界经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第11期27-50,共24页 The Journal of World Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71873142)、国家自然科学基金项目(71733003) 国家自然科学青年基金项目(71401009)的资助
关键词 双边进口需求弹性 贸易限制指数 福利损失 中美经贸摩擦 bilateral import demand elasticities trade restrictiveness indices welfare losses Sino-US economic and trade frictions
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献81

  • 1许统生,涂远芬.中国贸易弹性的估计及其政策启示[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(12):14-22. 被引量:33
  • 2鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):71-84. 被引量:143
  • 3朱宪辰,李玉连.领导、追随与社群合作的集体行动——行业协会反倾销诉讼的案例分析[J].经济学(季刊),2007,6(2):581-596. 被引量:40
  • 4Anderson, J.E. and Neary, J. P. "Measuring the Restrictiveness of Trade Policy. " The World Bank Economic Review, 1994,8.(2) ,pp. 151-169.
  • 5Anderson, J.E. and Neary, J. P. "A New Approach to Evaluating Trade Policy. " The Review of Economic Studies, 1996, 63.(1) ,pp. 107-125.
  • 6Aziz,J. and Li,X. M. "China's Changing Trade Elasticities. " China & World Economy, 2008.
  • 7Caves, D.W. ; Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E. "Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Pro- ductivity Using Superlative Index Numbers. "The Economic Journal, 1982,92 .( 365 ), pp. 73-86.
  • 8Broda,C. and Weinstein,D. E. "Globalization and the Gains from Variety. " Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2006,121 .(2) ,pp. 541-585.
  • 9Diewert, W.E. "Applications of Duality Theory. "Frontiers of Quantitative Economics II, Amsterdam : North- Holland, 1974.
  • 10Diewert, W.E. and Wales,T. J. "A Normalized Quadratic Semiflexible Functional Form. "Journal of Economet- rics, 1988,37 .( 3 ), pp. 327-342.

共引文献306

同被引文献228

引证文献22

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部