期刊文献+

基于CT的DESH量表评分在特发性正常压力脑积水中的应用 被引量:3

Application of CT-based disproportionately enlarged subarachnoidspace hydrocephalus scale score in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨基于CT的DESH量表评分在特发性正常压力脑积水中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析29例疑似iNPH患者临床及影像学资料,所有患者治疗前均行头颅CT及MR检查。分别对样本的头颅CT及MR图像进行DESH量表评分,比较CT与MR的DESH量表各参数的一致性,包括侧脑室扩大指数(Evans'index,EI)、侧裂池扩大、大脑凸面挤压效应、胼胝体角(CA)及局部脑沟扩张的评分。结果:iNPH患者CT与MR的DESH量表各评分参数组内相关系数如下:ICC EI为0.928,ICC侧脑室评分为0.905,ICC CA为0.855,ICC CA评分为0.743,ICC侧裂池评分为0.983,ICC凸面挤压评分为0.984,ICC局部脑沟评分0.814,ICC DESH总分0.914。结论:CT与MR图像的DESH量表各参数评分具有良好的一致性,头颅薄层CT的三维重建图像可应用于iNPH患者DESH量表评分。 Objective:To investigate the value of CT-based disproportionately enlarged subarachnoidspace hydrocephalus(DESH)scale score for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus(iNPH).Methods:The clinical and imaging data of 29 patients with suspected iNPH were retrospectively analyzed.All patients underwent CT and MR examination before treatment.The DESH scale parameters were scored on the CT and MR images respectively and the intraclass correlation coefficients(ICCs)was calculated.The parameters included Evans'index(EI),scores of lateral ventricles dilation,sylvian fissure dilation,tight high convexity,callosal angle(CA)and focal sulcal dilation.Results:The ICCs between DESH scale scores of CT and MR were mostly greater than 0.9(ICC EI=0.928,ICC ventriculomegaly=0.905,ICC sylvian fissures dilation=0.983,ICC tight high convexity=0.984,ICC total score=0.914).The ICCs of CA,CA score and focal sulcal dilation were between 0.7 and 0.9.Conclusion:The DESH scale score for iNPH patients is also applicable to three-dimensional thin-wall CT of the brain.
作者 张弘 何文杰 林帆 汪香玉 雷益 ZHANG Hong;HE Wen-jie;LIN Fan(Shantou University Medical College,Guangdong 515000,China)
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2019年第11期1219-1223,共5页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 脑积水 正常压力 DESH量表 体层摄影术 X线计算机 磁共振成像 Hydrocephalus normal pressure Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoidspace hydrocephalus scale Tomography X-ray computed Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献30

  • 1Klinge P, Hellstrom P, Tans J, et al. One-year outcome in the European multicentre study on iNPH [ J ]. Acta Neurol Scand, 2012,126 ( 3 ) : 145-153. DOI: 10. llll/j. 1600-0404. 2012. 01676. x.
  • 2Epub 2012 May 10. Bret P, Guyotat J, Chazal J. Is normal pressure hydrocephalus a valid concept in 2002? A reappraisal in five questions and proposal for a new designation of the syndrome as " chronic hydrocephalus" [ J ]. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2002, 73 (1) :9-12.
  • 3Shprecher D, Schwalb J, Kurlan R. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Diagnosis and Treatment [ J ]. Curt Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2008, 8 (5) : 371-376.
  • 4Moil E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, et al. Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus : Second Edition [ J ]. Neurol Med Chir, 2012, 52( 11 ) :775-809.
  • 5Bateman GA. Vascular compliance in normal pressure hydrocephalus [ J ]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2000, 21 ( 9 ) : 1574-1585.
  • 6Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, et al. Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus [J]. Neurosurgery, 2005,57 ( 3 Supol) :$4-S16.
  • 7Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Drticke H, et al. Gait analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-which parameters respond to the CSF tap test? [J]. Clin Neurophysiol,2000, 111 (9) : 1678-1686.
  • 8Kuba H, Inamura T, Ikezaki K, et al. Gait disturbace in patients with low pressure hydrocephalus [ J ]. J Clin Neurosci, 2002, 9 ( 1 ) :33-36.
  • 9Hakim CA, Hakim R, Hakim S. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus [J]. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2001, 12(4) :761-773.
  • 10John J, Halperin MD, Roger Kurlan MD, et al. Practice guideline : Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Response to shunting and predictors of response[ J], Neurology,2015,85:2063-2071.

共引文献51

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部