多维动态学科评价研究——以环境科学与工程学科为例

Multidimensional Dynamic Discipline Evaluation Research——Taking Environmental Science and Engineering as an Example

以京津冀20所高校的一级学科环境科学与工程为例,选取Web of Science核心集近10年(2009年—2018年)的数据探讨多维度学科评价方法。宏观维度选取论文总发文量、总被引次数、篇均被引次数、h指数、年均增长率指标,从论文数量和质量两个方面分析学科总体发展态势,近10年,20所高校发表论文发表量逐年增加,清华大学、北京大学和北京师范大学的h指数排名前三,但北京师范大学学术论文的篇均被引次数有待提高。进一步通过学术迹和学术矩阵从微观方面分析了各院校间的具体差距,20所高校中除天津工业大学以外的其它院校零引论文比例较低,华北电力大学发表的论文能较快的获得业界的认可和引用,清华大学有大量的论文处在h尾区域。

This paper takes the first-level environmental science and engineering of 20 universities in Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei as an example,and selects the data of the core of Web of Science for nearly ten years(2009-2018)to explore multi-dimensional subject evaluation methods.The macro dimension selects the total number of papers,the total number of citations,the number of times of citations,the index of h,the average annual growth rate,and analyzes the overall development of the subject from the two aspects of the number and quality of the papers.The number of publications has increased year by year.The h-index of Tsinghua University,Peking University and Beijing Normal University ranks in the top three,but the number of citations of Beijing Normal University academic papers needs to be improved.Further,through academic traces and academic matrices,the specific gaps between colleges and universities are analyzed from the microscopic aspects.Among the 20 universities,except for Tianjin University of Technology,the proportion of zero-cited papers is low.The papers published by North China Electric Power University can be quickly recognized and quoted by person of the same occupation.Tsinghua University has a large number of papers in the h-tail area.