期刊文献+

思辨、实证与行动:教育研究的三维空间 被引量:22

Speculative Research, Empirical Research and Action Research: The Three-dimensional Space of Educational Research
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教育研究存在三种典型的研究范式:思辨、实证和行动。思辨研究是在求善基础上的求美,实证研究求真,行动研究求善。三种研究范式相伴相生、相对独立、各有所长、相互渗透。当前,我国教育研究领域思辨仍是主流研究范式,但实证研究发展迅猛,行动研究也日益被认可和关注。这三种范式研究者间缺乏沟通理解,研究质量不高,差异关注不够。今后需要加强科研方法训练,关注研究范式教育,尝试成果分类评价,发挥期刊引领作用,促进范式有机融合,建立研究三维空间,以实现教育研究真善美的统一。 There are three typical research paradigms in educational research:speculative research,empirical research and action research.The speculative research seeks the beauty on the basis of seeking the good,manifests the humanities discipline characteristic.The empirical research seeks truth,embodies the scientific characteristics.The action research seeks the good and manifests the engineering technical characteristics.The three research paradigms are relatively independent,and each has its own strong points and concomitant with others.Speculation is still the mainstream research paradigm in educational research in China,while empirical research is developing rapidly,and action research is increasingly recognized and paid attention to.At present,the main problems are the lack of understanding and communication among the three paradigms,the low research quality and the insufficient attention to the differences between paradigms.Therefore,it is necessary to strengthen the training of scientific research methods,pay attention to the education of research paradigm,try to classify and evaluate the results and give full play to the leading role of periodicals,promote the organic integration of paradigm and establish three-dimensional space for research,thus to realize the unity of truth,good and beauty in educational research.
作者 马勇军 姜雪青 杨进中 Ma Yongjun;Jiang Xueqing;Yang Jinzhong(Normal College,Qingdao University,Qingdao Shandong 266071,China)
出处 《中国教育科学(中英文)》 2019年第5期111-122,共12页 Education Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“教育研究、教育决策与教育实践的界面管理与协同效应”(71473140)
关键词 教育研究 研究范式 思辨研究 实证研究 行动研究 educational research paradigm speculative research empirical research action research
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

二级参考文献285

共引文献1076

同被引文献346

引证文献22

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部