不同性别留守儿童与非留守儿童的应对方式差异性研究

Gender differences in coping styles between left-behind children and non-left-behind children

目的不同性别留守儿童与非留守儿童的应对方式差异性。方法采用简易应对方式量表(SCSQ)对700名留守儿童和289名非留守儿童进行评估,衡量其积极应对方式和消极应对方式。结果留守儿童SCSQ积极应对方式高于非留守儿童(P<0.01)。对有无留守经历的男童和女童分别分析发现,有留守经历的男童SCSQ积极应对方式总分高于无留守经历的男童(P<0.05),有留守经历的女童SCSQ消极应对方式总分高于无留守经历的女童(P<0.05)。结论留守会让儿童心理应对方式更积极,但是不同性别儿童对此反应不同,男性儿童更愿意主动应对,而女性儿童则容易消极应对,提示儿童教育者及留守监护人根据儿童性别采取个体化教育策略。

Objective To explore the gender differences in coping styles between left-behind children and non-left-behind children.Methods A total of 700 left-behind children and 289 non-left-behind children were selected and assessed with Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire(SCSQ)to evaluate their positive coping styles and negative coping styles.Results The factor score of positive coping style of SCSQ in left-behind children was significantly higher than that in non-left-behind children(P<0.01).The factor score of positive coping style of SCSQ in left-behind boys was significantly higher than that in non-left-behind boys(P<0.05);and the factor score of negative coping style of SCSQ in left-behind girls was significantly higher than that in non-left-behind girls(P<0.05).Conclusion Left-behind experience has a positive effect on children’s coping style;however,there exists gender difference.Boys tend to cope positively,but girls tend to cope negatively,which suggests that individualized education strategy should be taken into consideration by educators and guardians.