期刊文献+

用户分享行为对社交媒体平台收益的影响 被引量:6

Effects of users’ sharing information on the profits of social network platforms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了讨论用户分享信息的经济价值,构建了双边市场模型,将用户分为分享型和浏览型两类,研究分享型用户比例的变化对平台定价和收益的影响.研究发现,垄断情况下,分享型用户比例的增加提高了平台注册费和利润.竞争情况下,若商户单归属,分享型用户比例的增加降低了平台注册费和利润;若商户多归属,随着分享型用户比例的增加,平台注册费表现出倒U型变化.同时,研究发现,垄断情况以及竞争且商户多归属情况下,两类用户带给商户收益的差距越小,越有利于平台的定价和利润. Users’ sharing information contains much economic value. Asuming there are two types of Users(sharing-type and browsing-type) on the social media, this paper develops a two-sided model and studies the impact of the ratio of sharing-type users on pricing and revenue. The results show that the monopoly platform obtains more revenues as the ratio of sharing-type users increases. However, both the platform price and profit will decrease with that ratio when there are two duopoly social media platforms in the market if the merchants are uni-homing. Moreover, the trend of price shows a reversed U-shape as the ratio of sharing-type users increases when merchants are multi-homing. Comparing the two cases of monopoly and competition with multi-homing merchants, the less the disparity of benefit vendors enjoy from interacting with users is, the more a platform enjoys, whether it is monopolistic or multi-homing.
作者 魏尉 梅姝娥 仲伟俊 Wei Wei;Mei Shu’e;Zhong Weijun(School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第5期621-631,共11页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BGL196)
关键词 社会化商务 双边市场 平台收益 信息分享 social commerce two-sided market platform profits information sharing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献59

  • 1汪漩,仲伟俊,梅姝娥.卖方推动下电子商务平台交易费定价策略分析[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,46(z1):1007-1013. 被引量:7
  • 2毛晶莹.中立交易平台型B2B电子商务网络定价模型研究[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),2005,44(5):625-628. 被引量:5
  • 3胥莉,陈宏民,潘小军.商业银行信用卡市场竞争策略研究[J].系统工程学报,2007,22(1):88-92. 被引量:3
  • 4Rochet J C, Tirole J. Two-sided markets: A progress report[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 645-667.
  • 5Armstrong M. Two-sided markets: Economic theory and policy implications[M] I/Choi J P. Recent Developments in Antitrust. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007: 39-60.
  • 6Li S L, Liu Y P, Bandyopadhyay S. Network effects in online two-sided market platform: A research note[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 49(2): 245-249.
  • 7Belleflamme P, Toulemonde E. Negative intra-group externalities in two-sided markets[J]. International Economic Review, 2009, 50(1): 245-272.
  • 8Rochet J C, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1(4): 990-1029,.
  • 9Armstrong M, Wright J. Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts[J]. Economic Theory, 2007, 32(2): 353-380.
  • 10Rochet J C, Tirole J. Cooperation among competitors: Some economics of payment card associations[J]. RAND Journal of Eco- nomics, 2002, 33(4): 549-570.

共引文献31

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部