期刊文献+

L3级自动驾驶汽车的接管安全性评价模型 被引量:12

Takeover Safety Evaluation Model for Level 3 Automated Vehicles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为评价L3级自动驾驶车辆接管的安全性,基于驾驶模拟器设计了双向六车道高速公路环境下的接管场景并进行驾驶模拟实验,驾驶人在自动驾驶过程中始终执行视觉次任务操作,次任务为观看3种难度等级的箭头图,接管场景为自车行驶中遇到同车道前方的一辆抛锚车辆,接管请求时间设为7 s,自动驾驶车辆的速度为110 km/h。实验共计招募了49名被试(男性30名,女性19名),平均年龄为31.06岁(标准差为7.10岁)。当车辆发出听觉+视觉的接管请求信号后,被试应通过按下转向盘上的切换按钮来获取车辆的控制权。以最小TTC的组别为因变量,设定最小TTC小于等于1 s为危险组,大于1 s为安全组,利用二元logistics回归建立接管安全性评价模型。研究结果表明:7 s的接管请求时间条件下,影响接管安全性的因素主要是接管反应时间和次任务,本文中建立的接管安全性评价模型的预测准确率达85.5%。 To evaluate the safety of takeover in Level 3 automated vehicles,the takeover scenario on a two-way six-lane highway is designed to conduct driving simulation experiments based on driving simulator.Drivers carry out the secondary tasks in vision all along during automated driving.The secondary tasks are watching arrowhead charts with three different-degrees of difficulty and the takeover scenario is that ago vehicle comes across a broken-down vehicle in front on the same lane,with a take-over request time of 7 s and an automated vehicle speed of 110 km/h.A total of 49 testees(30 males,19 females)are recruited for experiment with an average age of 31.06 years(standard deviation:7.10 years).After the vehicle sends auditory and visual request signals for takeover,testee should push the switch button on steering wheel to take back vehicle control.Bivariate logistic regression is used to build the evaluation model for takeover safety,with the group of minimum TTC taken as dependent variable:minimum TTC≤1s is set as dangerous group and minimum TTC>1s is set as safe group.The results show that in the condition of 7s takeover request time,the factors affecting takeover safety are takeover reaction time and secondary task,and the prediction accuracy of the takeover safety evaluation model built reaches 85.5%.
作者 林庆峰 王兆杰 鲁光泉 Lin Qingfeng;Wang Zhaojie;Lu Guangquan(School of Transportation Science and Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 100191)
出处 《汽车工程》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2019年第11期1258-1264,共7页 Automotive Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金(U1664262) 国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0804802)资助
关键词 自动驾驶 驾驶人行为 接管 建模 次任务 automated driving driver behavior takeover modeling secondary task
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1魏朗,周维新,李春明,高丽敏,代素珍.驾驶员道路认知特性模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2005,5(4):116-120. 被引量:13
  • 2张浩然,任刚,王炜.基于相关分析和安全车距的跟驰模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(1):73-75. 被引量:13
  • 3KIEFER R J, LEBLANC D J, FLANNAGAN C A. Developing an Inverse Time-to-collision Crash Alert Timing Approach Based on Drivers' Last-second Bra- king and Steering Judgments[J]. Accident Analysis Prevention, 2005,37 (2) :295-303.
  • 4MILANES V, PEREZ J, GODOY J, et al. A Fuzzy Aid Rear-end Collision Warning/Avoidance System [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012,39 (10) 9097-9107.
  • 5SMITH D L,NAJM W G,GLASSCO R A. Feasibili- ty of Driver Judgment as Basis for a Crash Avoidance Database[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2002, 1784:9-16.
  • 6VOGEL K. A Comparison of Headway and Time to Collision as Safety Indicators[J]. Accident Analysis Prevention, 2003,35 (3) 427-433.
  • 7CHENG B, LIN Q F,SONG T J, et al. Analysis of Driver Brake Operation in Near-crash Situation Using Naturalistic Driving Data[J]. International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2011,2 (4) : 87-94.
  • 8HIRST S,GRAHAM R. The Format and Perception of Collision WarningsEM//NOY I Y I. Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997:203-219.
  • 9BROWN T L, LEE J D, MCGEHEE D V. Human Performance Models and Rear-end Collision Avoid- ance Algorithms[J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2001,43 (3) :462-482.
  • 10肖永剑,杨建国,王兆安.基于占先度的驾驶员冲突避碰决策模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2009,9(5):116-120. 被引量:9

共引文献34

同被引文献132

引证文献12

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部