期刊文献+

医疗人工智能应用中的伦理困境及对策研究 被引量:15

Ethical Dilemma and Countermeasures in the Application of Medical Artificial Intelligence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着人工智能在医疗领域的深入应用,在促进医学发展的同时,也带来了一些伦理困境。基于医疗人工智能的概念及应用现状,从医疗共情难以实现、保密问题仍存风险、责任认定不清晰和算法歧视四个方面探讨了人工智能技术给医疗领域带来的伦理困境。尝试提出了加强患者的隐私保护、构建以人为主体的“人-机共同体”、建立医疗人工智能监管机构、对算法研发人员进行伦理规范和立法四个对策建议,以此来解决医疗领域人工智能技术发展过程中出现的伦理困境。 With the in-depth application of artificial intelligence in the medical field,it not only promotes the development of medicine,but also brings some ethical dilemmas.This paper first briefly introduces the concept and application status of medical artificial intelligence,and then discusses the ethical dilemmas brought by artificial intelligence technology in the medical field from four aspects,including difficult realization of medical empathy,risks of confidentiality,unclear responsibility identification and algorithm discrimination.Finally,this paper puts forward four countermeasures and suggestions,such as strengthening the protection of patient privacy,building a"human-machine community"with human as major body,establishing medical artificial intelligence regulatory agency,and carrying out ethical norms and legislation for algorithm developers,so as to solve the ethical dilemmas in the development of artificial intelligence technology in the medical field.
作者 刘琪 谷笑颖 LIU Qi;GU Xiao-ying(School of Marxism,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430081,China)
出处 《医学与哲学》 2019年第21期5-8,共4页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2019年湖北省科技厅软科学研究课题(2019ADD163) 2019年湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究项目(19Q020) 2019年江汉大学武汉研究院开放课题(IWHS20192033)
关键词 医疗人工智能 伦理困境 保密 责任 歧视 medical artificial intelligence ethical dilemmas confidentiality responsibility discrimination
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献44

  • 1Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, et al. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review [ J ]. Acad Med,2013,88(8) :1171-1177.
  • 2Gouveia VV, Milfont TL, Gouveia RS, et al. Brazilian-Portuguese empathy quotient: evidences of its construct validity and reliability [ J ]. Span J Psycho1,2012,15 ( 2 ) :777-782.
  • 3Mercer SW, Reynolds WJ. Empathy and quality of care [ J ]. Br J Gen Pract,2002,52(Suppl) :S9-S13.
  • 4Aomatsu M, Otani T, Tanaka A, et al. Medical students' and residents' conceptual structure of empathy: a qualitative study [J]. Educ Health (Abingdon) ,2013,26( 1 ) :4-8.
  • 5Jones LM, Huggins TJ. Empathy in the dentist-patient relationship:review and application [ J ]. N Z Dent J, 2014,110 (3) :98-104.
  • 6Neumann M, Bensing J, Mercer S,et al. Analyzing the " nature" and " specific effectiveness" of clinical empathy: a theoreticaJ overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda [J]. Patient Edu Couns,2009,74(3) :339-346.
  • 7Lim BT, Moriarty H, Huthwaite M, et al. How well do medical students rate and communicate clinical empathy [ J ]. Med Teach, 2013,35 (2) :e946-e951.
  • 8Zumoff R. Diabetes study shows connection between physician empathy, outcomes [ J ]. Nephrol News Issues,2012,26 (12) :20.
  • 9Usichenko TI, Rottenbacher I, Kohlmann T, et al. Implementation of the quality management system improves post-operative pain treatment: aprospeetivepre-/post-interventional questionnaire study [ J]. Br J Anaesth ,2013,110( 1 ) :87-95.
  • 10Mehrabian A, Epstein N. A measure of emotional empathy[ J]. J Pers, 1972,40(4) :525-543.

共引文献178

同被引文献170

引证文献15

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部