摘要
目前,各地司法机关已经进行了许多人工智能应用在刑事证明标准判断上的尝试,但仍然难以替代法官完成刑事证明标准判断的全部过程。首先,刑事证明标准的主观判断难以被取代;其次,由于刑事证明标准在刑事诉讼各阶段和不同种类案件中呈现的差异性,证明标准难以被统一化和固定化;最后,人工智能技术的“算法黑箱”也使得刑事证明标准判断过程的透明化难以实现。因此,在人工智能的浪潮下,冷静看待这一技术,坚持其刑事证明标准判断中辅助性定位,做好数据收集以及人才培养工作才是正确的应对之道。
At present,judicial organs around the country have made many attempts to apply artificial intelligence to judge the standard of criminal proof,but it is still difficult to replace judges to complete the whole process of judging the standard of criminal proof.At first,the subjective judgment of criminal proof standard is difficult to be replaced.Secondly,because of the differences in the presentation of criminal proof standard at different stages of criminal proceedings and different types of cases,it is difficult to unify and fix the proof standard.Finally,the“algorithmic black box”of artificial intelligence technology makes the transparency of the judgment process of criminal proof standard difficult to achieve.Therefore,in the tide of artificial intelligence,it is the right way to treat this technology calmly,adhere to its auxiliary positioning in the judgment of criminal proof standards,and do a good job in data collection and personnel training.
作者
雷秋生
LEI Qiu-sheng(People’s Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China)
出处
《北京警察学院学报》
2019年第5期29-33,共5页
Journal of Beijing Police College
关键词
人工智能
刑事证明标准
局限性
算法黑箱
artificial intelligence
standard of criminal proof
limitations
algorithmic black box