摘要
书刊版式专有权是我国《著作权法》第36条授予出版者的一项著作邻接权。从历史之维考察,版式专有权与著作权之间存在着紧密的特定联系,重在发挥制止版式影印盗版等摹本复制和非法传播这一反不正当竞争机制本应具备的功能。版式专有权的保护范围问题应当从权利客体和权能范围两个维度进行考察:从权利客体来看,版式专有权并非设计人针对图文版面布局所提出来的独创性表达部分,而是书刊版面布局经过排版制作、编辑及加工之后的最终呈现形式——版面形式,不应参照作品的独创性要件来认定是否受著作权法保护。同时,版式专有权应理解为出版者对同一出版内容之出版物的版面形式所享有的权利。从权能范围来看,版式专有权主要规制以影印或类似方式对版面形式实施的摹本复制,实际上关注从客体保护边界而非行为模式范畴对其保护范围进行界定。通过考察各国立法例和法解释学分析,无论是从实然还是应然层面,版式专有权的权能范围都有必要延伸至信息网络传播利益。
The neighboring rights of typographical arrangement,granted to publishers,are regulated by article 36 of the Copyright Law.Investigating from a historical perspective,neighboring rights of typographical arrangement have a close and specific relationship with the copyright.The neighboring rights of typographical arrangement lay emphasis on the function of preventing facsimile copying such as photocopying piracy and illegal dissemination,which are supposed to be regulated by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.The protection scope of neighboring rights of typographical arrangement should be researched from two dimensions:the object of rights and the scope of competency of rights.From the perspective of the object of rights,neighboring rights of typographical arrangement are directed against typographical forms,the final presentation forms of layout of books and periodicals after typesetting,editing and processing,rather than typographical designs,the original expression proposed by the designer.So,we should not refer to the originality of works to determine whether the forms are protected by the Copyright Law.Meanwhile,neighboring rights of typographical arrangement should be interpreted as the publishers’right to typographical forms of the publication with the same content.From the perspective of the scope of competency of rights,the neighboring rights of typographical arrangement mainly regulate the facsimile copying of the typographical forms in the form of photocopying or other similar ways.Actually,the definition of the protection scope of the rights focus on the boundary of the object rather than the pattern of the behavior.Through the investigation of national legislation examples and the analysis based on legal interpretation,it is necessary to extend the scope of the neighboring rights of typographical arrangement to the interests of the internet communication,whether in terms of actual rights or idealistic rights.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第11期48-58,共11页
Intellectual Property
基金
2016年国家社科基金项目“传媒发展融合中的转换性使用著作权问题研究”(16BFX169)的研究成果
关键词
版式专有权
版面形式
著作权
独创性
信息网络传播权
neighboring rights of typographical arrangement
typographical forms
copyright
originality
the right of communication through information network