期刊文献+

人对智能机器行为的道德判断:现状与展望 被引量:4

Moral Judgment of Intelligent Machines’ Behavior: Current Situation and Prospects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着人工智能的发展,智能机器逐步进入人类社会。智能机器与人类社会的交互,尤其是人-机交互中涉及的伦理道德问题,越来越受到众多研究者的重视。本文主要关注智能机器道德框架构建及人们对智能机器行为道德判断两方面,整理了近年来关于智能机器道德决策的相关研究文献,重点探讨智能机器的道德体系,人们对人类-机器行为道德判断的差异,对智能机器行为的道德取向及影响人们对其道德判断的主要因素等,并指出未来研究方向。 With the advent of artificial intelligence,intelligent machines(robots)are stepping into the human society.The interaction between intelligent machines and human society,especially the ethical issues involved in human-intelligent machine interaction,has gained increasing attention from researchers.The present study focuses on the frame construction of artificial morality and individual’s moral judgment of intelligent machines’behavior.Based on a comprehensive review of previous research on moral judgment of intelligent machines’behavior,the present paper mainly discusses intelligent machines’moral competence,moral judgment of human-intelligent machines asymmetry,and the main factors affecting people’s moral judgment of intelligent machines.Suggestions for future research are also offered.
作者 赵雷 李园园 叶君惠 胡凤培 ZHAO Lei;LI Yuan-yuan;YE Jun-hui;HU Feng-pei(School of Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China;Zhejiang Police College,Hangzhou 310053,China)
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2019年第4期306-318,共13页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基金 国家自然科学基金(31900781) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJC190033) 浙江省社科规划课题成果(20XXJC05ZD)
关键词 人工智能 智能机器 道德判断 artificial intelligence intelligent machines moral judgment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献75

  • 1陈晓平.功利与情感之间——评休谟的道德哲学[J].哲学研究,2003(2):75-80. 被引量:15
  • 2Aguilar, P. , Brussino, S. , & Ferntlndez-Dols, J. M. (2013). Psychological distance increases uncom-promising consequentialism. Journal of Experimen- tal Social Psychology ,49 ( 3 ) ,449 - 452.
  • 3Amit, E. , Algom, D. , & Trope, Y. ( 2009 ). Dis- tance-dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Gen- eral,138(3) ,400 -415.
  • 4Amit,E. ,& Greene, J. D. (2012). You see. the ends don' t justify the means visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 23 ( 8 ) , 861 - 868.
  • 5Conway, P. , & Gawronski, B. ( 2013 ). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision mak- ing: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ,104 ( 2 ) ,216 - 235.
  • 6Cushman, F. ( 2013 ). Action, outcome, and value : A dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17 ( 3 ) , 273 - 292.
  • 7Cushman, F. , Murray, D. , Gordon-McKeon, S. , Wharton, S. , & Greene, J. D. (2012). Judgment before principle:Engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7 ( 8 ) , 888 - 895.
  • 8Cushman, F. , Young, L. , & Greene, J. D. (2010). Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view. In J. M. Doris (Ed.) , The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology, ( pp. 47 - 71 ). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
  • 9Cushman, F. , Young, L. , & Hauser, M. D. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment:Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science ,17( 12 ) , 1082 - 1089.
  • 10Davis,J. I. ,Gross,J. J. ,& Ochsner, K. N. (2011). Psychological distance and emotional experience: What you see is what you get. Emotion, 1i (2) , 438 - 444.

共引文献40

同被引文献127

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部