摘要
“宿宿”“信信”二词的解释一直以来众说纷纭,尤其是“信信”的被当作“住宿”义的起源及发展都存在争议,无论哪一种说法都尚未得到业界一致认可。文章针对同时期的字形做了一些对比研究,提出“信信”可能为“处处”之误判。文章从各家注释剖析、词义考、文献考、发展考四个角度对其作了对比分析。
The interpretation of the terms"Susu"and"Xinxin"has been widely debated,especially the origin and development of the"Xinxin"as"accommodation".There is no dispute in any way.The article made some comparative studies on the glyphs of the same period which believed that the"Xinxin"is proposed as the misjudgment of"Chuchu".In order to verify this conjecture,based on this conjecture,the article compared and analyzed that from four portions,such as the various annotation analysis,word meaning test,literature test,development test four aspects of those words.
作者
刘圆媛
Liu Yuan-yuan(School of Literature,Yunnan Normal University,Kunming,Yunnan 650000,China)
出处
《齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报》
2019年第5期65-68,共4页
Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers College
关键词
《诗经》
宿宿
信信
处处
词义发展
"Classic of Poetry"
Susu
Xinxin
Chuchu
word development