期刊文献+

罗兰·巴特的时装符号思想研究 被引量:1

A Study on Roland Barthes’s Semiological Thoughts of Fashion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 罗兰·巴特将各种社会现象包括服装都纳入符号学的分析范围内。在《流行体系》中,巴特区分了真实服装、意象服装、书写服装三种服装类型,他绕开现实层面,从时装杂志的语言入手分析书写服装。这种由书写服装建构出的时装修辞系统,赋予了时尚活动以意义。巴特发现时装杂志利用语言修辞将服装说得天花乱坠,除了使时尚主体产生某种幻想外,最主要的目的是刺激消费者的购买欲,赢取经济利益。巴特将时装讨论置于一个“封闭”结构,不关注事实上的时装变化,这或许有失偏颇,但这种研究方法为时装研究提供了一种新的范式,对之后的时装与时尚研究产生了影响深远,因而具有重要的研究价值。 According to Roland Barthes,all kinds of social phenomena could be treated as the research object of semiology.The study of fashion symbols as a turning point in his academic thoughts was often overlooked by the academic circles.In The Fashion System,Barthes distinguishes three kinds of clothing forms and analyzes the written clothing based on the language of fashion magazines.With the rhetorical system,written clothing produces the meaning of fashion activities.He thinks that fashion magazines make fashion meaningful and fantastic through the rhetorical system to stimulate consumers’consumption desire.His theory which analyzes written clothing in a closed structure overlooks the actual fashion changes,but this kind of semiological method provides a new fashion research paradigm that has far-reaching implications for future fashion studies.Therefore,it is of great significance to have it studied.
作者 肖朝阳 XIAO Zhao-yang(The Center for Literary Theory and Aesthetics,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,China)
出处 《美育学刊》 2019年第6期112-117,共6页 Journal of Aesthetic Education
关键词 罗兰·巴特 时装 能指 所指 符号 修辞系统 Roland Barthes fashion signifier signified sign rhetorical system
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1李葆嘉.论索绪尔符号任意性原则的失误与复归[J].语言文字应用,1994(3):22-28. 被引量:83
  • 2屠友祥.索绪尔“符号学”设想的缘起和意图[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,35(5):34-42. 被引量:31
  • 3维特根斯坦,2003年.《哲学研究》,载《维特根斯坦全集》第8卷,涂纪亮译,河北教育出版社.
  • 4索绪尔,1980,《普通语言学教程》[M],高名凯译.北京:商务印书馆.
  • 5Bally, C. 1940. L,arbitraire du signe. Valeur et signification [J]. Le francais moderne 8193-206.
  • 6Benveniste, E. 1939/1966. La nature du signe linguistique [A], In E. Benveniste (ed.)Problemes de Linguistique Generate 1 [C]. Paris : Gallimard. 49-55.
  • 7Engler, R. 1968. Lexique de la Terminologie Saussurienne [M]. Utrecht/Anvers : Spectrum.
  • 8Gardiner, A. 1944. De Saussure,s analysis of the signe linguistique [J]. Acta Linguistica 4107-110.
  • 9Godel, R. 1957. Les Sources manuscrites du Cours de Linguistique Generate de F. de Saus-sure [M]. Geneve: Droz.
  • 10Henry, V. 2001. Antinomies Linguistiques [M]. Louvain-Paris: Editions peeters.

共引文献45

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部