期刊文献+

超声刀和常规电刀手术治疗乳腺癌的优劣差异 被引量:5

Difference between Ultrasonic Scalpel and Conventional Electric Scalpelin the Operative Treatment of Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨超声电刀和常规电刀在手术治疗乳腺癌的优劣差异。方法:选取2015年9月~2018年9月某院收治的乳腺癌患者共40例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各20例。观察组给予超声刀手术治疗,对照组采用常规电刀手术治疗,比较两组的手术情况、引流情况及术后并发症发生情况。结果:观察组患者的手术时间、术中出血量及伤口愈合时间均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者术后24h引流量、总引流量及引流时间均显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症的总发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:超声刀手术治疗乳腺癌效果显著,能有效缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量、术后引流量,降低术后并发症的发生,值得临床广泛推广。 Objective:To explore the advantages and disadvantages of ultrasonic scalpel and conventional electric scalpel in the operative treatment of breast cancer.Methods:A total of 40 cases of breast cancer patients admitted to a hospital from September 2015 to September 2018 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 20 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with ultrasonic scalpel operation,while the control group was treated with conventional electric scalpel operation.The operation,drainage and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time,intraoperative blood loss and wound healing time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05);The total drainage volume,total drainage volume and drainage time 24 hours after operation in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of ultrasound scalpel surgery in the treatment of breast cancer is significant.It can effectively shorten the operation time,reduce the amount of bleeding,postoperative drainage,reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications,and is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 黄珊 Huang Shan(Department of Surgery,Guangning County People's Hospital,Guangdong Province,Zhaoqing 526300)
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2019年第12期1745-1747,共3页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 超声刀 常规电刀 乳腺癌 手术 ultrasonic scalpel conventional electric scalpel breast cancer operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献61

  • 1周洪伟,曾晓华,余永康,王志刚.超声刀在乳腺癌根治术中的临床应用研究[J].临床超声医学杂志,2004,6(4):213-215. 被引量:16
  • 2刘春萍,石岚,程波,黄韬.超声刀与电刀在乳腺癌手术治疗中应用效果比较[J].华中医学杂志,2005,29(6):455-456. 被引量:9
  • 3Cakan A, Cagirici U,Cikirikcioglu M, et al. The histo- logical effect of harmonic scalpel and electrocautery in lung resections. An experimental study in a rat model [J]. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ,2004,45(1):63-65.
  • 4Deo SV, Shukla NK, Asthana S, et al. A comparative study of modified radical mastectomy using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery[J]. Singapore Med J, 2002, 43(5): 226-228.
  • 5Hoenig DM, Chrostek CA, Amaral JF. Laparosonic coagulating shears: alternative method of hemostatic control of unsupported tissue[J]. J Endourol, 1996, 10:431-433.
  • 6Porter KA, O' Connor S, Rimm E, et al. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy [J]. Am J Surg,1998,176(1):8-11.
  • 7Kanehira E, Omura K, Kinoshita T, et al. How secure are the arteries occluded by a newly developed ultrasonically acti- vated device[J]. Surg Endose, 1999,13(4) : 340-342.
  • 8Armstrong DN, Amhroze WL, Schertzer ME, et al. Harmon- ic scalpel vs electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2001,44(4) :558-564.
  • 9Hoenig DM, Chrostek CA, Amaral JF. Laparosonic coagula- ting shears:alternative method of hemostatic control of unsup- ported tissue[J]. J Endourol,1996,10(5):431-433.
  • 10Cakan A, Cagirici U, Cikirikcioglu M, et al. The histological effect of harmonic scalpel and electrocautery in lung resec- tions: an experimental study in a rat model[J]. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ,2004,45(1) :63-65.

共引文献30

同被引文献27

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部