浙江省农业可持续发展水平评价

Evaluation of agricultural sustainable development level in Zhejiang Province

以浙江省25个国家农业可持续发展试验示范县(市、区)为考查对象,构建了基于农业资源禀赋、农业发展水平、农业从业人员科技水平、经济效益、社会效益、生态效益等6个层面的农业可持续发展水平综合评价指标体系。在对数据进行无量纲化处理的基础上,采用变异系数方法,从子系统得分和综合得分2个方面,对其农业可持续发展水平进行评价。结果显示,浙江省25个国家农业可持续发展试验示范县(市、区)的农业资源禀赋、农业发展水平、农业从业人员科技水平、经济效益、社会效益、生态效益加权得分分别介于0.0711~0.6429、0.1954~1.3119、0.0931~1.0668、0.5870~1.7201、0.0123~0.9179、0.3833~1.8809,总得分介于3.2611~5.9464,其中,德清得分最高,安吉、定海次之,兰溪得分最低。整体上看,各地区农业可持续发展综合水平相对均衡。各层面中,农业发展水平和生态效益的得分率超过50%,但农业从业人员科技水平和社会效益的得分率不足40%。提出加强农民职业培训、更加重视农业生态的可持续发展、增强区域发展协调性的建议。

In the present study,25 national agricultural sustainable development experimental demonstration counties(cities,districts)in Zhejiang Province were selected as investigation objects,and a multi-level comprehensive evaluation index system was constructed based on 6 aspects,namely,agricultural resource endowment,agricultural development level,agricultural practitioners technology level,economic benefit,social benefit and ecological benefit.By using data dimensionless treatment and coefficient of variation method,the sustainable development level was evaluated from both subsystem score and synthesis score.It was shown that the subsystem score of agricultural resource endowment,agricultural development level,agricultural practitioners technology level,economic benefit,social benefit and ecological benefit of 25 national agricultural sustainable development experimental demonstration counties(cities,districts)was 0.0711-0.6429,0.1954-1.3119,0.0931-1.0668,0.5870-1.7201,0.0123-0.9179,0.3833-1.8809,respectively,and the synthesis score was 3.2611-5.9464.Deqing got the highest synthesis score,and was followed by Anji and Dinghai,while Lanxi got the lowest synthesis score.In general,the sustainable development level was balanced among the 25 demonstration counties(cities,districts).In these subsystems,the score rate of agricultural development level and ecological benefit was higher than 50%,yet the score rate of agricultural practitioners technology level and social benefit was less than 40%.According suggestions were put forward such as enhancing talent cultivation,focusing on the sustainable development of agricultural ecology,improving the development balance within regions.