摘要
18世纪自由主义女性主义诞生以来,女性主义进入法律并形成不同法学流派。自由主义法律范式、福利国家法律范式与程序主义法律范式三种范式法律观视阈下,女性主义法学呈现出不同的样态。自由主义女性主义法学追求男女法律平等、形式平等,但形式平等容易掩盖或带来事实不平等,从而使女性贫困化、边缘化。福利国家女性主义法学追求事实平等、实质平等,但容易造成家长主义的看管,导致女性新的依附或在就业、尊严上的负反馈循环,同样不能实现女性的解放与自由。程序主义女性主义法学试图通过法律平等与事实平等之间的辩证法,突出福利国家和自由主义平等政治对女性施加"同化"压力的重围,来思考男性与女性之间的关系以及女性与女性之间的关系。女性主义法学的研究,对建设中国特色社会主义性别文化、构建中国特色社会主义女性主义法学有启示作用。
Since the birth of liberal feminism in the 18 th century,feminism has formed different schools of jurisprudence after entering the law field.Feminist jurisprudence presents a different pattern from the perspectives of paradigmatic legal view such as liberal legal paradigm,welfare state legal paradigm and procedural legal paradigm.Liberal feminist jurisprudence pursues legal equality and formal equality of men and women,but formal equality tends to mask or create factual inequality which leads to female marginalization and poverty.Feminist jurisprudence in welfare states pursues factual equality and substantive equality,but it’s prone to paternalism,leading to a new attachment or negative feedback cycle on job and dignity for women.As a result,women’s liberation and freedom can not be achieved.Proceduaral feminist jurisprudence tries to think about the relationship between men and women and the relationship between women through dialectics between legal equality and de facto equality,highlighting the "assimilation" pressure imposed on women by the welfare state and liberal equality politics.The study of feminist jurisprudence has an enlightening effect on the construction of gender culture with Chinese characteristics and the construction of socialist feminist jurisprudence with Chinese characteristics.
作者
彭凤莲
PENG Feng-lian(Law School,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu Anhui 241002,China)
出处
《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第6期73-82,共10页
Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD135)