期刊文献+

《山海经》旧注辨正十九则 被引量:7

Nineteen Rectification of Old Notation of the Classics of Mountains and Rivers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《山海经》作为我国先秦时期的一部典籍,具有重要的文献价值,已经得到学界的公认。郭璞的《山海经》注对我们解读《山海经》具有重要的价值,但它在流传过程中产生了不少的文献错误,为我们正确理解《山海经》带来了障碍,因此需要经过仔细校勘,尽量还原其本貌。同时,郭璞以后的历代《山海经》注家都做出了或多或少的贡献,但亦存在不当之处,同样需要经过辨析,以纠正其错误。 As a Chinese classic in Pre-Qin time,the Classic of Mountains and Rivers is of great documental value and has been widely acknowledged by academia.Guo Pu’s notations of the Classic of Mountains and Rivers is of great importance for our interpretation of this very work,but many errors appeared in its circulation,and this has brought about obstacles for the correct understanding;therefore,we should carefully edited them and try our best to restore its original state.Meanwhile,other scholars after the time of Guo Pu have all made some contribution,but there are still some improper points,which also need some analysis so as to correct these mistakes in them.
作者 贾雯鹤 JiaWenhe(School of Literature and Journalism,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu 610041,Sichuan)
出处 《西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2019年第6期119-125,共7页 Journal of Northwest Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 2018年国家社会科学基金项目“《山海经》汇校集释”(项目编号:18BZW084)
关键词 《山海经》 旧注 辨正 郭璞 元钞本 the Classic of Mountains and Rivers old notations rectifying Guo Pu transcript in Yuan Dynasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1王晖.古文字中记数使用“又”字的演变及其断代作用考[J].陕西师大学报(哲学社会科学版),1991,20(2):112-119. 被引量:2
  • 2袁珂.山海经校注,1993.
  • 3山海经,1936.
  • 4张岩.〈山海经〉与古代社会,1999.
  • 5郝懿行.山海经笺疏,1991.
  • 6毕沅.山海经新校正,1986.
  • 7颜之推;王利器.颜氏家训集解,1980.
  • 8逸周书,1937.
  • 9卫聚贤.山海经的研究,1934.
  • 10袁珂.《山海经》写作的时地及篇目考,1982.

共引文献17

同被引文献16

引证文献7

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部