期刊文献+

急性胆囊炎最佳腹腔镜手术时机选择及影响因素分析 被引量:7

Optimal timing and influencing factors of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗急性胆囊炎的最佳手术时机,分析影响腹腔镜手术转开腹的原因.方法纳入2014年1月至2018年7月太原市第八人民医院普外科收治的行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者82例的临床资料,根据起病至手术时间将患者分为四组,A组(21例)起病至手术时间为48 h以内,B组(26例)起病至手术时间48~72 h,C组(19例)起病至手术时间>72 h至1周,D组(16例)起病至手术时间>1周.对比各组手术时间、术中出血量、转开腹比例、并发症发生率,分析影响转开腹的危险因素.结果A组、B组、C组、D组患者转开腹率分别为4.76%(1/21)、19.23%(5/26)、26.32%(5/19)、18.75%(3/16),C组转开腹率最高,A组最低,C组、A组与其他组差异均有统计学意义(χ^2=3.635、4.181、3.682、3.552、3.448,均P<0.05).单因素分析显示,转开腹与患者胆囊是否肿大、胆囊壁厚度、手术时机有关(均P<0.05).多因素分析显示,胆囊壁厚度≥6 mm[OR=1.310(95%CI:0.681~1.264),P=0.001]、手术时机(>48 h)[OR=2.672(95%CI:0.261~0.961),P=0.000]是急性胆囊炎腹腔镜术中转开腹的独立危险因素.结论急性胆囊炎起病48 h内进行腹腔镜手术可降低术中转开腹风险,胆囊壁厚度和手术时机是影响转开腹的独立危险因素. Objective To explore the best operative time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis,and analyze the causes of laparotomy.Methods The clinical data of 82 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Department of General Surgery,the Eighth People's Hospital of Taiyuan from January 2014 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the onset to operation time,the patients were divided into four groups:group A(21 cases,the onset to surgery time was within 48 h),group B(26 cases,the onset to surgery time was 48-72 h),group C(19 cases,the onset to surgery time was>72 h-1 week),group D(16 cases,the onset to surgery time was more than 1 week).The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,conversion of abdominal cavity and complication rate were compared,and the risk factors of conversion to laparotomy were analyzed.Results The open abdominal rates of group A-D were 4.76%(1/21),19.23%(5/26),26.32%(5/19)and 18.75%(3/16),respectively.The rate of open abdomen in group C was the highest,which of group A was the lowest.There were statistically significant differences between group A and the other three groups(χ^2=3.635,4.181,3.682,3.552,3.448,all P<0.05).Single factor analysis showed that the laparotomy was related to the enlargement of the gallbladder,the thickness of the gallbladder,and the time of operation(all P<0.05).The analysis of multiple factors showed that the thickness of the gallbladder wall more than 6 mm[OR=1.310(95%CI:0.681-1.264),P=0.001],the time of operation more than 48 h[OR=2.672(95%CI:0.261-0.961),and P=0.000]were independent risk factors for transabdominal surgery of acute cholecystitis laparoscopy.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery within 48 hours of acute cholecystitis can reduce the risk of transabdominal surgery.The thickness of the gallbladder and the timing of the operation are independent risk factors affecting the transabdominal operation.
作者 王斌 Wang Bin(Department of General Surgery,the Eighth Peoples Hospital of Taiyuan,Taiyuan,Shanxi 030012,China)
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2019年第22期2712-2715,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 胆囊炎 急性 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 手术时机 因素分析 统计学 Cholecystitis acute Cholecystectomy laparoscopic Operative timing Factor analysis statistical
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1刘祖明,李果生.急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除的时机选择体会[J].第三军医大学学报,2005,27(19):1978-1978. 被引量:25
  • 2Toru Ikegami,Ken Shirabe,Tomoharu Yoshizumi,Hiroto Kayashima,Yoshihiko Maehara.Use of the SAND balloon catheter in single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg . 2013 (2)
  • 3Mark Joseph,Michael R. Phillips,Timothy M. Farrell,Christopher C. Rupp.Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Associated With a Higher Bile Duct Injury Rate: A Review and a Word of Caution[J]. Annals of Surgery . 2012 (1)
  • 4Adolfo Pisanu,Isabella Reccia,Giulia Porceddu,Alessandro Uccheddu.Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Studies Comparing Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CMLC)[J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2012 (9)
  • 5Ahmad Mohmmad Zubaidi,Casey M. Calkins.Single-Port Laparascopic Cholecystectomy: Scarless Cholecystectomy[J]. Minimally Invasive Surgery . 2012
  • 6Jun Ma,Maria A. Cassera,Georg O. Spaun,Chet W. Hammill,Paul D. Hansen,Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle.Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy[J]. Annals of Surgery . 2011 (1)
  • 7Pratibha Vemulapalli,Emmanuel Atta Agaba,Diego Camacho.Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single center experience[J]. International Journal of Surgery . 2011 (5)
  • 8Umut Barbaros,Aziz Sümer,Fatih Tunca,Osman G?zkün,Tu?rul Demirel,Orhan Bilge,Valentina Randazzo,Ahmet Din??a?,Ridvan Seven,Sel?uk Mercan,Demir Budak.Our Early Experiences With Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery: The First 32 Patients[J]. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques . 2010 (5)
  • 9Evangelos C. Tsimoyiannis,Konstantinos E. Tsimogiannis,George Pappas-Gogos,Charalampos Farantos,Nikolaos Benetatos,Paraskevi Mavridou,Adamantia Manataki.Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (8)
  • 10Jonathan Hernandez,Sharona Ross,Connor Morton,Kellie McFarlin,Sujat Dahal,Farhaad Golkar,Michael Albrink,Alexander Rosemurgy.The Learning Curve of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site (LESS) Cholecystectomy: Definable, Short, and Safe[J]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons . 2010 (5)

共引文献12

同被引文献97

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部