期刊文献+

分娩镇痛下第二产程剖宫产及产钳术145例分析 被引量:6

Analysis of 145 cases of cesarean section and forceps midwifery during the second stage of labor under labor analgesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察分娩镇痛下第二产程实施剖宫产及产钳术的指征及母儿结局。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年10月湘雅医院第二产程剖宫产88例、产钳术57例产妇的临床资料,比较两组的干预指征、产道或子宫切口裂伤、产后出血、新生儿体重、窒息、转科率及第二产程和决策至分娩时间。结果:产钳助产组指征主要是胎儿窘迫,剖宫产组是胎头下降停滞。产钳助产组裂伤、产后出血、血色素下降及新生儿转科率高于剖宫产组,决策至胎儿娩出时间和住院时间短于剖宫产组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组产妇填塞、输血、第二产程时间、新生儿出生体重、窒息及新生儿损伤情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:产钳术能较快结束分娩,但应注意裂伤及产后出血,剖宫产组应避免子宫切口延裂。 Objective:To observe the indications and outcomes of cesarean section and forceps midwifery during the second stage of labor under labor analgesia.Methods:The clinical data of 88 cases of cesarean section and 57 cases of forceps midwifery during the second stage of labor at Xiangya Hospital from January 2016 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.The intervention indications,birth canal or uterine incision laceration,postpartum hemorrhage,neonatal weight,asphyxia,rate of admission to neonatal ICU(NICU)as well as the second stage of labor and decision-making to delivery time were compared between the two groups.Results:The main midwifery indication in the obstetric forceps group was fetal distress,and the main indication of delivery in the cesarean section group was fetal head arrest.The rates of laceration,postpartum hemorrhage,decrease of hemoglobin and NICU in the forceps group were higher than those in the cesarean section group,while the decision-making to delivery time and hospitalization days were shorter than those in the cesarean section group with statistically significant difference(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in maternal tamponade,blood transfusion,time of the second stage of labor,birth weight,asphyxia and neonatal injury between the two groups(P>0.05).The time and length of stay in the cesarean section group were shorter than those in the cesarean section group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Obstetric forceps can make the delivery faster,while attention should be paid to avoid laceration and postpartum hemorrhage.Cesarean section should avoid uterine laceration.
作者 蹇文艳 姚若进 JIAN Wenyan;YAO Ruojin(Department of Gynecology,Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410008,China)
出处 《临床与病理杂志》 2019年第11期2432-2436,共5页 Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research
关键词 产钳助产 新产程 分娩镇痛 第二产程剖宫产 forceps delivery new labor mode labor analgesia second stage cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献57

  • 1岑坚敏,钱德英,洪淡华,黄志宏.头位产钳术49年回顾分析[J].广东医学,2004,25(7):820-822. 被引量:3
  • 2傅才英,吴佩煜,翁霞云主编.妇产科手术学[M].第2版,北京:人民军医出版社,2003:320.
  • 3潘勉,许真.产钳助产术200例临床分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2007,28(16):1934-1935. 被引量:6
  • 4段涛,杨慧霞.产科手术学[M].11版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:235.
  • 5谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119.
  • 6王卫平.儿科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:271-277.
  • 7Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spon- taneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010,116(6) :1281 - 1287.
  • 8American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ( the College ), the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, et al. Safe pre- vention of the primary cesarean delivery [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014,210(3 ) :179 - 193.
  • 9凌萝达,顾美礼.难产《头位难产(修订版)》[M].第2版.重庆:重庆出版社,1999.245-254.
  • 10Crichton D. A reliable method of establishing the level of the fetal head in obstetrics[ J ]. S Afr M ed J, 1974, 48 (18) :784-787.

共引文献216

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部