摘要
BACKGROUND The optimal way to home-monitor patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)for disease progression or relapse remains to be found.AIM To determine whether an electronic health(eHealth)screening procedure for disease activity in IBD should be implemented in clinical practice,scheduled every third month(3M)or according to patient own decision,on demand(OD).METHODS Adult IBD patients were consecutively randomized to 1-year open-label eHealth interventions(3M vs OD).Both intervention arms were screening for disease activity,quality of life and fatigue and were measuring medical compliance with the constant care web-application according to the screening interventions OD or 3M.Disease activity was assessed using home measured fecal calprotectin(FC)and a disease activity score.RESULTS In total,102 patients were randomized(n=52/503M/OD)at baseline,and 88 patients completed the 1-year study(n=433M;n=45 OD).No difference in the two screening procedures could be found regarding medical compliance(P=0.58),fatigue(P=0.86),quality of life(P=0.17),mean time spent in remission(P>0.32),overall FC relapse rates(P=0.49),FC disease courses(P=0.61),FC time to a severe relapse(P=0.69)and remission(P=0.88)during 1 year.Median(interquartile range)numbers of FC home-monitoring test-kits used per patient were significantly different,3M:6.0(5.0-8.0)and OD:4.0(2.0-9.0),P=0.04.CONCLUSION The two eHealth screening procedures are equally good in capturing a relapse and bringing about remission.However,the OD group used fewer FC home testkits per patient.Individualized screening procedures can be recommended for adult IBD patients in clinical web-practice.
BACKGROUND The optimal way to home-monitor patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) for disease progression or relapse remains to be found.AIM To determine whether an electronic health(e Health) screening procedure for disease activity in IBD should be implemented in clinical practice, scheduled every third month(3 M) or according to patient own decision, on demand(OD).METHODS Adult IBD patients were consecutively randomized to 1-year open-label e Health interventions(3 M vs OD). Both intervention arms were screening for disease activity, quality of life and fatigue and were measuring medical compliance with the constant care web-application according to the screening interventions OD or3 M. Disease activity was assessed using home measured fecal calprotectin(FC)and a disease activity score.RESULTS In total, 102 patients were randomized(n = 52/50 3 M/OD) at baseline, and 88 patients completed the 1-year study(n = 43 3 M; n = 45 OD). No difference in the two screening procedures could be found regarding medical compliance(P =0.58), fatigue(P = 0.86), quality of life(P = 0.17), mean time spent in remission(P> 0.32), overall FC relapse rates(P = 0.49), FC disease courses(P = 0.61), FC time to a severe relapse(P = 0.69) and remission(P = 0.88) during 1 year. Median(interquartile range) numbers of FC home-monitoring test-kits used per patient were significantly different, 3 M: 6.0(5.0-8.0) and OD: 4.0(2.0-9.0), P = 0.04.CONCLUSION The two e Health screening procedures are equally good in capturing a relapse and bringing about remission. However, the OD group used fewer FC home testkits per patient. Individualized screening procedures can be recommended for adult IBD patients in clinical web-practice.
基金
Supported by Calpro AS
Crohn Colitis patient society Denmark
North Zealand University Hospital and Ferring Pharmaceuticals
