摘要
BACKGROUND The fundus of the stomach is regarded as a difficult area for endoscopic resection of small tumors originating from the muscularis propria(MP tumors).Three endoscopic resection techniques have been developed to treat these tumors,including ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection(L-EFTR),snareassisted EFTR(S-EFTR),and endoscopic submucosal dissection-assisted EFTR(EEFTR).To date,no studies have compared these techniques.AIM We aimed to evaluate and compare S-EFTR with L-EFTR and E-EFTR for treating small MP tumors in the gastric fundus.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with primary small MP tumors in the gastric fundus and treated by these three techniques between January 2016 and December 2018 at Shengjing Hospital,China.Standard demographic and clinicopathologic data,including sex,age,tumor size,surgeon details,and pathological results,were collected.Data regarding operation duration,cost,enbloc resection,and severe complications were also extracted and compared.RESULTS A total of 36 patients(27 women)with a mean age of 55.8±10.20 years were included in this study.The mean tumor size was 9.0±3.98 mm.All the methods showed a 100%en-bloc resection rate and 0%severe complication rate.There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups in the operation duration(P=0.148).The cost comparison for the whole procedure was as follows:E-EFTR>L-EFTR>S-EFTR(5837.5±7212.96 CNY,5970.7±3465.27 CNY,5852.0±6438.25 CNY,respectively,P<0.001).CONCLUSION S-EFTR,L-EFT,and E-EFTR are all effective for resection of small MP tumors in the gastric fundus.S-EFTR is superior in terms of cost-effectiveness.
BACKGROUND The fundus of the stomach is regarded as a difficult area for endoscopic resection of small tumors originating from the muscularis propria(MP tumors).Three endoscopic resection techniques have been developed to treat these tumors,including ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection(L-EFTR), snareassisted EFTR(S-EFTR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection-assisted EFTR(EEFTR).To date, no studies have compared these techniques.AIM We aimed to evaluate and compare S-EFTR with L-EFTR and E-EFTR for treating small MP tumors in the gastric fundus.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients with primary small MP tumors in the gastric fundus and treated by these three techniques between January 2016 and December 2018 at Shengjing Hospital, China.Standard demographic and clinicopathologic data, including sex, age, tumor size, surgeon details, and pathological results, were collected.Data regarding operation duration, cost, enbloc resection, and severe complications were also extracted and compared.RESULTS A total of 36 patients(27 women) with a mean age of 55.8 ± 10.20 years were included in this study.The mean tumor size was 9.0 ± 3.98 mm.All the methods showed a 100% en-bloc resection rate and 0% severe complication rate.There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups in the operation duration(P = 0.148).The cost comparison for the whole procedure was as follows: E-EFTR > L-EFTR > S-EFTR(5837.5 ± 7212.96 CNY, 5970.7 ± 3465.27CNY, 5852.0 ± 6438.25 CNY, respectively, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION S-EFTR, L-EFT, and E-EFTR are all effective for resection of small MP tumors in the gastric fundus.S-EFTR is superior in terms of cost-effectiveness.
