期刊文献+

不同化疗方案治疗局部进展期结直肠癌临床疗效的比较研究

A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同化疗方案治疗局部进展期结直肠癌的临床疗效。方法选取梧州市工人医院2015年1月-2018年1月收治的局部进展期结直肠癌患者70例,根据化疗方式分为对照组和观察组,各35例。对照组患者给予FOLFOX7化疗方案治疗,观察组患者给予XELOX化疗方案治疗。比较两组患者近期疗效,毒副作用及随访指标。结果观察组近期疗效总有效率高于对照组,毒副作用发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术后转移发生率、局部复发率、1年生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组癌胚抗原(CEA)差值、糖抗原19-9(CA19-9)差值高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与FOLFOX7化疗方案相比,XELOX化疗方案治疗局部进展期结直肠癌的临床疗效较好,安全性较高,但对提高术后生存率未见明显优势。 Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced colorectal cancer.Methods A total of 70 cases of patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer were selected from January 2015 to January 2018 in Wuzhou Worker’s Hospital,which were divided into control group and observation group according to the way of chemotherapy,35 cases in each group.The control group were treated with FOLFOX7 chemotherapy regimen,while the observation group were treated with XELOX chemotherapy regimen.The short-term efficacy,side effects and followup indicators were compared between the two groups.Results The observation group of short-term total effective rate was higher than the control group,and the incidence rate of toxic and side effects was lower than the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of metastasis and local,1-year survival rate between the two groups(P>0.05);the observation group of the difference of CEA and CA19-9 were higher than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with FOLFOX7 regimen,XELOX regimen has better clinical efficacy and higher safety for locally advanced colorectal cancer,but it has no obvious advantage in improving the survival rate.
作者 周健 周毅 ZHOU Jian;ZHOU Yi(Department of Hematology and Oncology,Wuzhou Worked s Hospital,Wuzhou 543000,China)
出处 《临床合理用药杂志》 2019年第30期6-7,10,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 化疗 毒副作用 治疗结果 Colorectal neoplasms Chemotherapy Toxic side effects Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献89

  • 1吴共发,胡洁,王雅娟,赵海燕,韩慧霞.结直肠癌与其淋巴结转移癌及结直肠癌细胞上皮-间质转化的对比研究[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(4):251-255. 被引量:11
  • 2陈中皓,王学志,徐铭,杨华,黄忠华.Survivin、MMP-2、nm23-H1、VEGF及其受体Flt-1在结直肠癌中的表达及临床意义[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(4):290-293. 被引量:12
  • 3朱陵君,陈志鹏,王美林,陈涛,束永前.结直肠癌中miRNA基因及其靶基因多态性位点的研究进展[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(1):69-73. 被引量:7
  • 4施兵,张秀兵,徐健.XELOX方案与OLF方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床观察[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2007,21(6):525-526. 被引量:3
  • 5Sakamoto J, Clin K, Kondo K, et al. Phase lI study of a 4 - week capecitabine regimen in advanced or recurrent gastric- cancer[ J ]. Anticaneer Drugs,2006,17 (2) :231 - 236.
  • 6Sawada N, Kondoh K, Moil K. Enhancement of eapeeitabine efficacy by oxaliplatin in human eolorectal and gastric canc- er xenografts [ J ]. Oncology Reports, 2007,18 ( 4 ) : 775 - 778.
  • 7Dlaz - Rubio E, Tabernero J, G6mez - Espafia A, et al. Phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with continuous - infusion fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin as first -line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: final re- port of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors Trial [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 (27) : 4224 - 4230.
  • 8Ducreux M, Bennouna J, Hebbar M, et al. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin(XELOX) versus 5 - fluorouracil/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin( FOLFOX- 6)as first- line treatment for meta- static colorectal cancer[ J ]. Int J Cancer,2011,128 (3) : 682 - 690.
  • 9Willett CG, Boucher Y, Ditomaso E, et al. Direct evidence that the VEGF -specific antibody bevacizumab has antivas- cular effects in human rectal cancer[ J ]. Nat Med,2004,10 (2) :145 - 147.
  • 10Tyagi P, Grothey A. Commentary on a phase III trim of bev- acizumab plus XELOX or FOLFOX4 for first - line treat- ment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the N016966 trial[ J ]. Clin Colorectal Cancer,2006,6(4) :261 -264.

共引文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部