期刊文献+

超声造影定量分析诊断乳头状甲状腺癌患者颈部淋巴结转移的效能分析 被引量:21

Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探究超声造影(CEUS)定量分析诊断乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)患者颈部淋巴结转移的效能分析。方法回顾性分析2017年1月-2018年1月在宁波市鄞州人民医院行手术治疗的90例PTC患者,根据术后病理是否发生颈部淋巴结转移将其分为转移组(40例)和无转移组(50例),比较2组患者癌结节大小,CEUS特征(灌注强度、均匀强度、灌注缺损及灌注模式),CEUS定量参数[上升时间(RT)、峰值强度(PI)、平均渡越时间(MTT)、曲线下面积(AUC)、峰值降半时间(TPH)、上升斜率(WIS)及达峰时间(TTP)],应用ROC曲线分析CEUS相关指标取不同cut-off值的诊断价值。结果100个癌结节中76.00%(76/100)表现为低增强,89.00%(89/100)表现为灌注强度不均匀,转移组癌结节大小显著高于无转移组(P=0.002);2组患者癌结节边缘区PI、AUC和WIS显著高于中央区(均P<0.05),转移组边缘区PI、边缘区AUC显著高于无转移组(均P<0.001);ROC曲线显示,癌结节边缘AUC、边缘PI和结节大小的AUC分别为0.866、0.869和0.720,其中边缘AUC和边缘PI对颈部淋巴结转移的诊断效能均高于癌结节大小(P=0.026、0.018);Youden指数提示癌结节边缘AUC、边缘PI和结节大小位于最佳截点时,边缘AUC和边缘PI的准确率、灵敏度和阴性预测值的诊断价值显著高于结节大小(PAUC=0.042、0.001、0.019,PPI=0.018、0.003、0.022)。结论在PTC患者颈部淋巴结是否发生转移的诊断中,癌结节边缘区CEUS定量参数PI和AUC准确率和灵敏度高,具有重要的临床意义。 Objective To explore the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer(PTC).Methods A retrospective analysis was made on 90 patients with PTC who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2018.The patients were divided into metastasis group(40 cases)and non-metastasis group(50 cases)according to whether cervical lymph node metastasis occurred after operation.The size of cancer nodules,CEUS characteristics(perfusion intensity,uniform intensity,perfusion defect and perfusion mode),CEUS quantitative parameters[rise time(RT),Peak intensity(PI),mean transit time(MTT),area under curve(AUC),peak halving time(TPH),wash in slope(WIS)and time to peak(TTP)]were compared between the two groups.The ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of CEUS related indicators for different cut-off values.Results Seventy-six percent of 100 cancer nodules showed low enhancement,89.00%showed non-uniform perfusion intensity,and the size of cancer nodules in metastatic group was significantly higher than that in non-metastatic group(P=0.002).PI,AUC and WIS in the marginal area of cancer nodules in the two groups were significantly higher than those in central area(all P<0.05),while PI,AUC in the marginal area in the metastatic group were significantly higher than those in the non-metastatic group(all P<0.001).The ROC curve showed that the edge AUC,edge PI and AUC of nodule size were 0.866,0.869 and 0.720,respectively.The diagnostic efficiency of the edge AUC and PI for cervical lymph node metastasis was higher than that of the size of the cancer nodule(P=0.026,0.018).Youden index indicated that the accuracy,sensitivity and negative predictive value of edge AUC and edge PI were significantly higher than those of nodule size at the best cut-off point(PAUC=0.042,0.001,0.019,PPI=0.018,0.003,0.022).Conclusion In the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with PTC,the CEUS quantitative parameters PI and AUC in the margin of cancer nodules have high accuracy and sensitivity,which have important clinical significance.
作者 王海燕 朱林林 周如海 李嘉根 WANG Hai-yan;ZHU Lin-lin;ZHOU Ru-hai(Department of Ultrasound,Ningbo Yinzhou People's Hospital,Ningbo,Zhejiang 315000,China)
出处 《中华全科医学》 2019年第12期2079-2082,共4页 Chinese Journal of General Practice
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2017KY613)
关键词 超声造影 乳头状甲状腺癌 淋巴结转移 定量分析 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Papillary thyroid cancer Lymph node metastasis Quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献70

  • 1董海英,李萍,宁春平,房世保.超声造影定量分析在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2013,10(2):110-114. 被引量:46
  • 2张滨.甲状腺癌颈淋巴结清扫术的适应证及手术要点[J].临床外科杂志,2006,14(3):139-140. 被引量:15
  • 3罗葆明,欧冰,智慧,曾婕,杨海云.改良超声弹性成像评分标准在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的价值[J].现代临床医学生物工程学杂志,2006,12(5):396-398. 被引量:367
  • 4Popoveniuc G,Jonklaas J. Thyroid nodules[J].Med Clin North Am, 2012,96(2) :329-349.
  • 5Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M, et al. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast- enhanced ultrasound : initial results[J].Eur Radiol, 2006,16 (10) : 2234-2241.
  • 6Cantisani V, Consorti F, Guerrisi A, et al. Prospective comparative evaluation of quantitative-elastosonography (Q- elastography ) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of thyroid nodules: preliminary experience[J].Eur J Radiol, 2013,82( 11 ) : 1892-1898.
  • 7Jiang J, Huang LL, Zhang HL, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography of thyroid nodules [J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2015,43 (3):153-156.
  • 8Zhang B, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules [J]. Thyroid, 2010, 20(1 ) :51-57.
  • 9Ma JJ, Ding H, Xu BH, et al.Diagnostic performances of various gray-scale,color Doppler,and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings in predicting malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Thyroid, 2014,24(2) :355-363.
  • 10Hong YR, Yan CX, Mo GQ, et al. Conventional US, elastography, and contrast enhanced US features of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma predict central compartment lymph node metastases [J].Sci Rep,2015,5:7748.

共引文献168

同被引文献182

引证文献21

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部