期刊文献+

成人手术患者全麻前评估内容的构建 被引量:3

Construction of pre-anesthesia assessment content in adult patients with general anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的构建成人手术患者全麻前评估内容,探讨麻醉门诊评估的规范化和标准化。方法通过对麻醉前评估指南、麻醉风险评估工具、临床麻醉评估单进行内容分析,构建麻醉前评估初稿。运用两轮德尔菲专家咨询明确麻醉前评估内容的维度、条目和指标。结果选入专家31名,两轮问卷有效率均为100%,专家权威系数均为0.91,协调系数W值为0.217和0.163(P<0.01),显示入选专家的积极程度、权威程度及协调程度较高。专家咨询共提出意见173条,研究小组采纳135条(78.0%)。最终明确成人手术患者全麻前评估内容,包括6个维度、53个条目和106个指标。结论本研究构建的成人手术患者全麻前评估内容较为科学合理,并适合我国国情,后续研究将聚焦评估模式,促进麻醉前评估的信息化和专业化。 Objective To construct the pre-anesthesia assessment content of adult general anesthesia in order to provide evidence for pre-anesthesia assessment standard. Methods The pre-anesthesia assessment was constructed by content analysis of pre-anesthesia assessment guidelines, anesthesia risk assessment tools, and clinical anesthesia assessment sheets. Use 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultation to identify the dimensions, entries, and indicators of the pre-anesthetic assessment. Results After 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultation, 31 experts were selected. The efficiency of the two rounds of questionnaires was 100%, the expert authority coefficient was 0.91, and Coordination coefficient W was 0.217 and 0.163(P<0.01), indicating the positive degree, authority and coordination degree of the selected experts higher. In the second round of Delphi expert consultation, a total of 173 comments were made and the research team adopted 135 articles(78.0%). Finally, the pre-anesthesia assessment of adult general anesthesia patients was defined, including 6 dimensions, 53 items, and 106 indicators. Conclusion The pre-anesthesia assessment of adult general anesthesia is scientific and reasonable, and it is suitable for use in China. The follow-up study will focus on the evaluation model and promote the evaluation and specialization of the pre-anesthesia assessment center.
作者 赵雪娇 阮洪 胡嘉乐 杨悦来 ZHAO Xuejiao;RUAN Hong;HU Jiale;YANG Yuelai(Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Nursing,Shanghai 200025,China)
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第11期1097-1102,共6页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金 上海市教委护理高原多学科创新基金(HLgy1601dxk) 上海交通大学医学院护理科研基金(Jyhz1703)
关键词 麻醉前评估 全身麻醉 成人手术 德尔菲法 Pre-anesthesia assessment General anesthesia Adult patient Delphi method
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1于秀荣,叶文琴,蔺香云,李建华.产科护理质量评价指标体系的研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(12):1080-1084. 被引量:62
  • 2Wayne W Daniel.Applied nonparametric statistics[J].2th edition.Boston:PWS-KENT Punlishing Company,1990:386-391.
  • 3程琮.SPSS统计分析教程[M].北京:现代教育出版社,2009.
  • 4World Alliance for Patient Safety. Forward Program 2004 [ EB/ OL]. http ://www. who. int/patientsafety/worldallianee/en/.
  • 5Wijeysundera DN. Preoperative consultations by anesthesiolo- gists [ J]. Curt" Opin Anaesthesiol, 2011, 24:326-330.
  • 6Giesecke NM. Anesthesiologists and patient safety [ J/OL]. ASA Monitor, 2014,78:4-5. http://monitor, pubs. asahq. org/article, aspx? articleid = 2432040.
  • 7Forbes SS, McLean RF. Review article: the anesthesiologist's role in the prevention of surgical site infections [ J]. Can J Anaesth, 2013, 60: 176-183.
  • 8Panesar SS, Noble D J, Mirza SB, et al. Can the surgical checklist reduce the risk of wrong site surgery in orthopae- dics? --Can the checklist help.'? Supporting evidence from analysis of a national patient incident reporting system [ J ]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2011, 18: 6-18.
  • 9Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 347 : 1633-1638.
  • 10Stiegler MP, Ruskin KJ. Decision-making and safety in anes- thesiology [J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2012, 25: 724-729.

共引文献254

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部