期刊文献+

国际科学教师探究教学研究脉络梳理与趋势展望——基于HistCite的图谱量化分析 被引量:1

Progress and Trend Analysis of International Research on Inquiry Teaching for Science Teachers——Visualized Quantitative Study Based on HistCite
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以Web of Science数据库为文献来源,对1986-2019年数据库收录的科学教师探究教学相关研究进行述评。应用HistCite科学计量可视化软件对科学教师探究教学研究的关键词、文献发表年份、分布地区和研究机构,以及载文期刊分布情况等内容进行分析,结果发现,关于科学教师探究教学的研究在2006年之后总体上呈现稳步上升的趋势。研究涉及不同的学科、研究主题和方法,且内容呈现不断细化、深化、多元化的趋势。美国是该领域学术研究最具代表性的国家,中国大陆的发文量和被引次数都较低。基于此,需要强化对探究教学本身的理论研究,增强对教师学习效果的追踪研究,重视本土建构与国际交流的有机互动,加强教师探究教学的纵向研究以及提高研究工具的科学性和适切性。 Based on the Web of Science database,this paper reviews the research on inquiry teachi ng of science teachers included in the database from 1986 to 2019.By using HistCity's visualization software of scientific metrology,this paper analyses the key words,the year of publication,the distribute area,the research institutes and the distribution of the journals published in the inquiry teaching research of science teachers.The results show that the research on inquiry teaching of science teachers has increased steadily since 2006.Research involves different disciplines,research themes and methods,and the content shows a trend of continuous refinement,deepening and diversification.The United States is the most representative country of academic research in this field,and the number of publications and citations in China's Mainland are relatively low.Therefore,it is necessary to strengthen the theoretical study of inquiry teaching itself,to strengthen the tracking study of teachers'learning effects,to pay attention to the organic interaction between local construction and international exchanges,to strengthen the longitudinal study of inquiry teaching and to improve the scientificity and appropriateness of research tools.
作者 李亚培 于海波 LI Yapei;YU Haibo
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第12期11-22,共12页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目2016年度课题“农村学校办学形态与品质提升研究”(项目编号:16JJD80015)的研究成果之一
关键词 科学教师 探究教学 HISTCITE science teacher inquiry teaching HistCite
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Garfield E. Historiographic Mapping of Knowledge Domains Literature[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2004, (2): 119-145.
  • 2Kirakowski J, Corbett M. SUMI: the Software Usability Measurement Inventory[J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1993, (3): 210-212.
  • 3Lin HX, Choong YY and Salvendy G A Proposed Index of Usability: a Method for Comparing the Relative Usability of Different Soitware Systems[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1997, (4-5): 267-278.
  • 4Squires D, Preece J. Predicting Quality in Educational Software: Evaluating for Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them[J]. Interacting with Computers, 1999, (5): 467-483.
  • 5Mayes JT, Fowler CJ. Learning Technology and Usability: a Framework for Understanding Courseware[J]. Interacting with Computers, 1999, (5): 485-497.
  • 6Nokelainen P. An Empirical Assessment of Pedagogical Usability Criteria for Digital Learning Material with Elementary School Students[J]. Educational Technology & Society, 2006, (2): 178-197.
  • 7Squires D, Preece J. Usability and Learning: Evaluating the Potential of Educational Software[J]. Computers & Education, 1996, (1): 15-22.
  • 8Parlangeli O, Marchigiani E and Bagnara S. Multimedia Systems in Distance Education: Effects of Usability on Learning[J]. Interacting with Computers, 1999, (1): 37-49.
  • 9Hombaek K. Current Practice in Measuring Usability: Challenges to Usability Studies and Research[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2006, (2): 79-102.
  • 10Zaharias P, Poylymenakou A. Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for E-Learning Applications: Beyond Functional Usability[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2009, (1): 75-98.

共引文献6

同被引文献11

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部