摘要
目的:对比异位妊娠诊断中阴道B超与腹部B超的临床作用。方法:2017年8月-2018年6月收治异位妊娠患者113例,均经腹腔镜检查与清宫术后病理组织学检查确诊,术前均行阴道B超与腹部B超诊断。对比两种不同诊断方式异位妊娠检出率、超声分型情况。结果:阴道B超异位妊娠检出率显著高于腹部B超,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。超声分型中胎囊型、破裂型、陈旧型检出率阴道B超显著高于腹部B超,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相较于腹部B超诊断,阴道B超在异位妊娠诊断中的应用可获取更高异位妊娠与超声分型检出率。
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of vaginal B-ultrasound and abdominal B-ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.Methods:From Aug 2017 to Jun 2018,113 cases of ectopic pregnancy were selected,all of them were diagnosed by laparoscopy and pathological histology after hysterectomy,vaginal B-ultrasound and abdominal B-ultrasound were performed before operation.The detection rate and ultrasonic classification of ectopic pregnancy in different diagnostic methods were compared.Results:The detection rate of transvaginal B-ultrasound in ectopic pregnancy was significantly higher than that of abdominal B-ultrasound,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);The examination rate of fetal capsule type,ruptured type and old type in ultrasonic classification was significantly higher than that in abdominal B ultrasound,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with abdominal B-ultrasound diagnosis,the application of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy can be used to obtain the detection rate of higher heterotopic pregnancy and ultrasonic typing.
作者
李曼娜
Li Manna(Department of Ultrasound,the affiliated Nanhua Hospital of Nanhua University,421000)
出处
《中国社区医师》
2019年第34期134-135,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
关键词
阴道
腹部
超声检查
异位妊娠
Vagina
Belly
Ultrasonic examination
Eccyesis