期刊文献+

3D腹腔镜与开放手术活体供肾切取术的临床疗效对比 被引量:1

Comparison of clinical efficacy between 3D laparoscopic and open surgery for living donor nephrectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨3D腹腔镜和开放手术活体供肾切取术的临床疗效。方法选取2011年1月至2019年2月期间于我移植中心完成的35例活体供肾切取术病例,根据手术方式不同,分别将行3D腹腔镜活体供肾切取术和开放活体供肾切取术的患者分为3D腹腔镜组(11例)和开放组(24例),比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、供肾热缺血时间、肾动脉长度、肾静脉长度、切口长度、术后24 h VAS、术后引流管拔除时间、术后出院时间、术前血肌酐、术后第1日血肌酐、术后第3日血肌酐、术后第7日血肌酐。结果与开放组相比,3D腹腔镜组手术时间长、术中出血量少、手术切口小、术后24 h VAS评分低、术后引流管拔除时间早和术后住院时间短(P<0.05),术前血肌酐、术后第1日血肌酐、术后第3日血肌酐及术后第7日血肌酐差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论3D腹腔镜活体供肾切取术安全可行,手术效果良好,具有对供体创伤小,术后供体恢复快等优势。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of 3D laparoscopic and open surgery for living donor nephrectomy.Methods A total of 35 patients with live donor kidney resection at our transplant center from January 2011 to February 2019 were enrolled.According to different surgical procedures,3D laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and open living donor kidney were performed on different cases.The patients who underwent surgery were divided into 3D laparoscopic group(11 cases)and open group(24 cases).The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,renal warm ischemia time,renal artery length,renal vein length,and incision length,postoperative 24 h VAS,postoperative drainage tube removal time,postoperative discharge time,preoperative serum creatinine,postoperative 1 day serum creatinine,postoperative 3rd day serum creatinine,postoperative 7th day serum creatinine were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the open group,the 3D laparoscopic group had a longer operation time,less intraoperative blood loss,smaller surgical incision,lower VAS score at 24 hours after surgery,earlier postoperative drainage tube removal time and shorter postoperative hospital stay(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in serum creatinine,serum creatinine on the first day after surgery,serum creatinine on the 3rd day after surgery,and serum creatinine on the 7th day after surgery(P>0.05).Conclusion 3D laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy is safe and feasible with good surgical results,and has the advantages of less donor trauma and faster postoperative donor recovery.
作者 刘印重 高小林 祁连友 张乐 姜泰茂 LIU Yinchong;GAO Xiaolin;QI Lianyou;ZHANG Le;JIANG Taimao(Graduate School of Air Force Hospital of the Northern People′s Liberation Army of Jinzhou Medical University(Urology),Shenyang 110042,China)
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2019年第21期3343-3346,共4页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 3D腹腔镜 肾移植 活体供肾 3D laparoscopy kidney transplantation living donor kidney
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1梁朝朝,周骏.3D腹腔镜技术在泌尿外科的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3):161-162. 被引量:25
  • 2Nam KW, Park J, Kim IY, et al. Application of stereo-imaging technology to medical field. Healthc Inform Res, 2012, 18 : 158- 163.
  • 3Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, et al. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the funda- mentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2012, 22: 865-870.
  • 4Sohn W, Lee HJ, Ahlering TE. Robotic surgery: review of pros- tate and bladder cancer. Cancer J, 2013, 19: 133-139.
  • 5von Pichler C, Radermacher K, Boeckmann W, et al. Three- dimensional versus two-dimensional video endoscopy: a clinical field study in laparoscopic application. Stud Health Technol Inform, 1996, 29: 667-674.
  • 6Becker H, Melzer A, Schurr MO, et al. 5-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol, 1993, 1 : 40- 46.
  • 7Calvano CJ, Moran ME, Tackett LD, et al. New visualization techniques for in utero surgery: amnioscopy with a three-dimen- sional head-mounted display and a computer-controlled endo- scope. J Endourol, 1998, 12: 407-410.
  • 8Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G, Rassweiler J, et al. Three-dimen- sional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks. J Endourol, 2012, 26: 1085-1088.
  • 9Chan AC, Chang SC, Yim AP, et al. Comparison of two-dimen- sional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic sur- gery. Surg Endosc, 1997, 11 : 438-440.
  • 10Yoshida T, Inoue H, Hara E, et al. Newly developed 3D endo- scopic system: preliminary experience. Endoscopy, 2003, 35 : 181-184.

共引文献111

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部