期刊文献+

Study on Assessment Model of Potential Risk in Car Following Scenario

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Car following is the most common driving scenario,and rear-end collisions in car following scenario are the most common accidents.TTC(time to collision)is widely employed as the risk indicator in existing rear-end collision warning systems,however,assessment model using only TTC may ignore some high-risk scenarios.Therefore,the concept of potential risk in car following scenario is proposed,and the driver’s maximum brake response time to avoid collision is defined as TM(time margin),which is the basis of the assessment model in this study.One hundred and thirty-nine(139)dangerous car following cases from China-FOT(Field Operation Test)naturalistic driving study database are extracted in reference from detection criteria on dangerous cases,of which TM at the braking moment of preceding vehicle is calculated,thus dangerous domains of two risk levels are determined by the distribution of TM.A potential risk warning system is also designed based on the assessment model,in order to further reduce rear-end collisions in combination with rear-end collision warning system.
出处 《Journal of Mechanics Engineering and Automation》 2019年第6期185-187,共3页 机械工程与自动化(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1LEE D N. A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information About Time to-collision[J]. Perception, 1976,5 (4) : 437-459.
  • 2VAN WINSUM W, HEINO A. Choice of Time-head- way in Car-following and the Role of Time-to-colli- sion Information in Braking[J]. Ergoaomics, 1996,39 (4) :579-592.
  • 3KIEFER R J,LEBLANC D J,FLANNAGAN C A. Developing an Inverse Time-to-collision Crash Alert Timing Approach Based on Drivers' I.ast-second Braking and Steering Judgments[J]. Accident Analy- sis & Prevention,2005,37(2) :295-303.
  • 4VAN DER HORST A R A. A Time-based Analysis of Road User Behaviour in Normal and Critical En counters[M]. Soesterberg:TNO Institute for Perception, 1990.
  • 5VOGEL K. A Comparison of Headway and Time to Collision as Safety Indicators[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2003,35 : 427-433.
  • 6WADA T,DOI S,IMAI K,et al. Analysis of Drivers' Behaviors in Car Following Based on Performance Index for Approach and Alienation [J]. SAE Paper 2007-01-0440.
  • 7KONDOH T,YAMAMURA T,KITAZAKI S,et al. Identification of Visual Cues and Quantification of Drivers' Perception of Proximity Risk to the Lead Vehicle in Car-following Situations[J]. Journal of Mechanical Systems for Transportation and I.ogis tics,2008,1(2) :170 180.
  • 8I.IN Q F,CHENG B,LAI J K,et al. A New Method for Analysis of Traffic Conflict by Using Video Drive Recorders[C]//ITS America. Proceedings of the 14th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Beijing:ITS America,2007:1-9.
  • 9LIN Q F, FENG R J, CHENG B, et al. Analysis of Causes of Rear end Conflicts Using Naturalistic Driv ing Data Collected by Video Drive Recorders[J]. SAE Paper 2008-01-0522.
  • 10CHENG B,I.IN Q F,LI G F,et al. Evaluation Meth od for Driver Risk Perception Models in Car-follow- ing Situations[C]//JSAE. Proceedings of JSAE 2011 Congress. Yokohama:JSAE,2011:18-18.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部